These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23154897)
1. Comparison of Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry in a population of Mexican open-angle glaucoma patients. Jimenez-Roman J; Gil-Carrasco F; Martinez A; Albis-Donado O; De la Torre-Tovar JD Int Ophthalmol; 2013 Jun; 33(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 23154897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Francis BA; Hsieh A; Lai MY; Chopra V; Pena F; Azen S; Varma R; Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17070592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma. Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Brusini P Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 May; 85(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 17488456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlation of intraocular pressure measured with goldmann and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Realini T; Weinreb RN; Hobbs G J Glaucoma; 2009 Feb; 18(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 19225347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Vico E; Fernandez-Vidal A; Benitez del Castillo JM; Wasfi M; Garcia-Sanchez J Ophthalmology; 2006 Dec; 113(12):2156-62. PubMed ID: 16996599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude comparisons in different types of glaucoma using dynamic contour tonometry. Punjabi OS; Ho HK; Kniestedt C; Bostrom AG; Stamper RL; Lin SC Curr Eye Res; 2006 Oct; 31(10):851-62. PubMed ID: 17050277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry, Uncorrected and Corrected Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Stage of Glaucoma. Wachtl J; Töteberg-Harms M; Frimmel S; Roos M; Kniestedt C JAMA Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 135(6):601-608. PubMed ID: 28494071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of central corneal thickness on dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in primary open-angle glaucoma. Grieshaber MC; Schoetzau A; Zawinka C; Flammer J; Orgul S Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Jun; 125(6):740-4. PubMed ID: 17562982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes. Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G Eye (Lond); 2009 Feb; 23(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 18219335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intraocular pressure measured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma. Morita T; Shoji N; Kamiya K; Hagishima M; Fujimura F; Shimizu K Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 248(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 19693527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma. Vandewalle E; Vandenbroeck S; Stalmans I; Zeyen T Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(5):783-9. PubMed ID: 19787598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness in primary congenital glaucoma. Jordão ML; Costa VP; Rodrigues Mde L; Paula JS Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Jan; 251(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 22555897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma. Sullivan-Mee M; Halverson KD; Qualls C J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects. Barleon L; Hoffmann EM; Berres M; Pfeiffer N; Grus FH Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Oct; 142(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 17011849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP): comparison in the same eyes after subsequent medical normalization of IOP. Yoo C; Eom YS; Kim YY Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Nov; 248(11):1611-6. PubMed ID: 20652303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus. Özcura F; Yıldırım N; Tambova E; Şahin A J Optom; 2017; 10(2):117-122. PubMed ID: 27402573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Goldmann Applanation Tonometry versus Dynamic Contour Tonometry after Vitrectomy with Silicone Oil Endotamponade. Fuest M; Mamas N; Walter P; Mazinani BE; Roessler G; Plange N Curr Eye Res; 2017 Jul; 42(7):1007-1012. PubMed ID: 28121186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in African American subjects. Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN Ophthalmology; 2007 Apr; 114(4):658-65. PubMed ID: 17141320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry, Goldmann and pneumotonometer in ocular hypertension patients and their relationship to pachymetry and ocular pulse amplitude]. Colás-Tomás T; Prieto-Del Cura M; Villafruela-Güemes I; Clariana-Martín A; Valdivia-Pérez A Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2012 Dec; 87(12):401-6. PubMed ID: 23121701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]