307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2315503)
1. Uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MR findings.
Kim SH; Choi BI; Lee HP; Kang SB; Choi YM; Han MC; Kim CW
Radiology; 1990 Apr; 175(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 2315503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preoperative staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MRI in 99 patients.
Kim SH; Choi BI; Han JK; Kim HD; Lee HP; Kang SB; Lee JY; Han MC
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1993; 17(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 8331236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical carcinoma with full-thickness stromal invasion: efficacy of dynamic MR imaging in the assessment of parametrial involvement.
Iwata S; Joja I; Okuno K; Miyagi Y; Sakaguchi Y; Kudo T; Hiraki Y
Radiat Med; 2002; 20(5):247-55. PubMed ID: 12450104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma.
Yang WT; Lam WW; Yu MY; Cheung TH; Metreweli C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Sep; 175(3):759-66. PubMed ID: 10954463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Invasive carcinoma of the cervix uteri (Stage IB-IIB). Comparison of CT and MR for the assessment of the parametrium].
Sironi S; Zanello A; Rodighiero MG; Vanzulli A; Taccagni GL; Belloni C; Del Maschio A
Radiol Med; 1991 May; 81(5):671-7. PubMed ID: 2057595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CT and ultra low field (0.02 T) MR imaging of uterine cervical carcinoma.
Varpula M; Kilholma P; Klemi P
Acta Radiol; 1994 Jul; 35(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 8011386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Carcinoma of the cervix: staging with MR imaging.
Togashi K; Nishimura K; Sagoh T; Minami S; Noma S; Fujisawa I; Nakano Y; Konishi J; Ozasa H; Konishi I
Radiology; 1989 Apr; 171(1):245-51. PubMed ID: 2928532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Staging of cervical cancer: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and pelvic examination under anesthesia.
Ho CM; Chien TY; Jeng CM; Tsang YM; Shih BY; Chang SC
J Formos Med Assoc; 1992 Oct; 91(10):982-90. PubMed ID: 1362678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the use of the transrectal surface coil and the pelvic phased-array coil in MR imaging for preoperative evaluation of uterine cervical carcinoma.
Kim MJ; Chung JJ; Lee YH; Lee JT; Yoo HS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1215-21. PubMed ID: 9129414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Carcinoma of the cervix: value of MR imaging in detecting parametrial involvement.
Sironi S; Belloni C; Taccagni GL; DelMaschio A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Apr; 156(4):753-6. PubMed ID: 2003441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early invasive cervical cancer: CT and MR imaging in preoperative evaluation - ACRIN/GOG comparative study of diagnostic performance and interobserver variability.
Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Coakley FV; Snyder B; Reinhold C; Schwartz LH; Woodward PJ; Pannu HK; Amendola M; Mitchell DG
Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):491-8. PubMed ID: 17940305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Role of X-ray computed tomography in the staging of cervical carcinoma].
Kojima Y
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Mar; 41(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 2732565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma with MR imaging: a reappraisal of diagnostic accuracy and pitfalls.
Sheu MH; Chang CY; Wang JH; Yen MS
Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(9):1828-33. PubMed ID: 11511909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [MR tomography in staging of carcinomas of the uterus].
Scheidler J; Heuck A; Reiser M
Radiologe; 1994 Jul; 34(7):377-83. PubMed ID: 7938485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Problem of pretherapeutic staging of cervical carcinoma. Studies of the diagnostic value of computerized tomography and magnetic resonance tomography in comparison with gynecologic palpation findings and pathologic-anatomic diagnosis].
Zapf S; Halbsguth A; Schweden F; Klose K; Lochner B; Beck T; Friese K; Kreienberg R
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1987 Dec; 47(12):838-42. PubMed ID: 3436507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Histopathology of uterine cervical carcinoma: diagnostic comparison of endorectal surface coil and standard body coil MRI.
Kaji Y; Sugimura K; Kitao M; Ishida T
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1994; 18(5):785-92. PubMed ID: 8089330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and endosonography in the local staging of carcinoma of the cervix.
Cobby M; Browning J; Jones A; Whipp E; Goddard P
Br J Radiol; 1990 Sep; 63(753):673-9. PubMed ID: 2205326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of MR imaging in invasive cervical carcinoma.
Boss EA; Barentsz JO; Massuger LF; Boonstra H
Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(2):256-70. PubMed ID: 10663755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Cross-sectional imaging of endometrial carcinoma: MR imaging and CT].
Hamm B; Pöllinger A
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2002 Jan; 124(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 11873311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma: phased array coil fast spin-echo versus body coil spin-echo T2-weighted MR imaging.
Yu KK; Hricak H; Subak LL; Zaloudek CJ; Powell CB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Sep; 171(3):707-11. PubMed ID: 9725301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
