These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23155729)

  • 1. Evidence for crossmodal interactions across depth on target localisation performance in a spatial array.
    Chan JS; Maguinness C; Lisiecka D; Setti A; Newell FN
    Perception; 2012; 41(7):757-73. PubMed ID: 23155729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retinotopic effects during spatial audio-visual integration.
    Meienbrock A; Naumer MJ; Doehrmann O; Singer W; Muckli L
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):531-9. PubMed ID: 16797610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peripheral visual localization is degraded by globally incongruent auditory-spatial attention cues.
    Ahveninen J; Ingalls G; Yildirim F; Calabro FJ; Vaina LM
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Sep; 237(9):2137-2143. PubMed ID: 31201472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Task-Specific, Age Related Effects in the Cross-Modal Identification and Localisation of Objects.
    Barrett MM; Newell FN
    Multisens Res; 2015; 28(1-2):111-51. PubMed ID: 26152055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Crossmodal congruency effects based on stimulus identity.
    Frings C; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 1354():113-22. PubMed ID: 20674555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unimodal and crossmodal gradients of spatial attention: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Föcker J; Hötting K; Gondan M; Röder B
    Brain Topogr; 2010 Mar; 23(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 19821021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual-somatotopic interactions in spatial perception.
    Samad M; Shams L
    Neuroreport; 2016 Feb; 27(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 26709693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Crossmodal interactions and multisensory integration in the perception of audio-visual motion -- a free-field study.
    Schmiedchen K; Freigang C; Nitsche I; Rübsamen R
    Brain Res; 2012 Jul; 1466():99-111. PubMed ID: 22617375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of crossmodal competition and dimensional overlap in crossmodal attention switching.
    Kreutzfeldt M; Stephan DN; Sturm W; Willmes K; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Feb; 155():67-76. PubMed ID: 25577489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Crossmodal Correspondence Between Auditory Pitch and Visual Elevation Affects Temporal Ventriloquism.
    Orchard-Mills E; Van der Burg E; Alais D
    Perception; 2016 Apr; 45(4):409-24. PubMed ID: 26655643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Audiotactile interactions in near and far space.
    Kitagawa N; Zampini M; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 166(3-4):528-37. PubMed ID: 16091968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Seeing the body modulates audiotactile integration.
    Aspell JE; Lavanchy T; Lenggenhager B; Blanke O
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 May; 31(10):1868-73. PubMed ID: 20584191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the relative contributions of multisensory integration and crossmodal exogenous spatial attention to multisensory response enhancement.
    Van der Stoep N; Spence C; Nijboer TC; Van der Stigchel S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Nov; 162():20-8. PubMed ID: 26436587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multisensory interactions in saccade target selection: curved saccade trajectories.
    Doyle MC; Walker R
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Jan; 142(1):116-30. PubMed ID: 11797089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Crossmodal spatial congruence effects: visual dominance in conditions of increased and reduced selection difficulty.
    Tomko L; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2017 Sep; 81(5):1035-1050. PubMed ID: 27612465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial coincidence modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 417(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 17408855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Overt spatial attention modulates multisensory selection.
    Jensen A; Merz S; Spence C; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Feb; 45(2):174-188. PubMed ID: 30589358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Task-demands and audio-visual stimulus configurations modulate neural activity in the human thalamus.
    Bonath B; Tyll S; Budinger E; Krauel K; Hopf JM; Noesselt T
    Neuroimage; 2013 Feb; 66():110-8. PubMed ID: 23085111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time course of auditory masker effects: tapping the locus of audiovisual integration?
    Steenken R; Diederich A; Colonius H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr; 435(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18355963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.