These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23155736)

  • 1. Associations between auditory pitch and visual elevation do not depend on language: evidence from a remote population.
    Parkinson C; Kohler PJ; Sievers B; Wheatley T
    Perception; 2012; 41(7):854-61. PubMed ID: 23155736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changing pitch of sounds alters perceived visual motion trajectory.
    Takeshima Y; Gyoba J
    Multisens Res; 2013; 26(4):317-32. PubMed ID: 24319926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Newborns are sensitive to the correspondence between auditory pitch and visuospatial elevation.
    Walker P; Bremner JG; Lunghi M; Dolscheid S; D Barba B; Simion F
    Dev Psychobiol; 2018 Mar; 60(2):216-223. PubMed ID: 29355921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of visual experience in the emergence of cross-modal correspondences.
    Hamilton-Fletcher G; Pisanski K; Reby D; Stefańczyk M; Ward J; Sorokowska A
    Cognition; 2018 Jun; 175():114-121. PubMed ID: 29502009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Crossmodal Correspondence Between Auditory Pitch and Visual Elevation Affects Temporal Ventriloquism.
    Orchard-Mills E; Van der Burg E; Alais D
    Perception; 2016 Apr; 45(4):409-24. PubMed ID: 26655643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of pitch-space correspondence on sound-induced visual motion perception.
    Hidaka S; Teramoto W; Keetels M; Vroomen J
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 231(1):117-26. PubMed ID: 24030519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Children's associations between space and pitch are differentially shaped by language.
    Dolscheid S; Çelik S; Erkan H; Küntay A; Majid A
    Dev Sci; 2023 Sep; 26(5):e13341. PubMed ID: 36315982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Space-pitch associations differ in their susceptibility to language.
    Dolscheid S; Çelik S; Erkan H; Küntay A; Majid A
    Cognition; 2020 Mar; 196():104073. PubMed ID: 31810048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is a High Tone Pointy? Speakers of Different Languages Match Mandarin Chinese Tones to Visual Shapes Differently.
    Shang N; Styles SJ
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2139. PubMed ID: 29270147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cross-linguistic comparison of frequency-following responses to voice pitch in American and Chinese neonates and adults.
    Jeng FC; Hu J; Dickman B; Montgomery-Reagan K; Tong M; Wu G; Lin CD
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):699-707. PubMed ID: 21543983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of cross-modal correspondences on working memory performance.
    Brunetti R; Indraccolo A; Mastroberardino S; Spence C; Santangelo V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Apr; 43(4):819-831. PubMed ID: 28345948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prelinguistic infants are sensitive to space-pitch associations found across cultures.
    Dolscheid S; Hunnius S; Casasanto D; Majid A
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Jun; 25(6):1256-61. PubMed ID: 24899170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial metaphor in language can promote the development of cross-modal mappings in children.
    Shayan S; Ozturk O; Bowerman M; Majid A
    Dev Sci; 2014 Jul; 17(4):636-43. PubMed ID: 24636133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptual and linguistic interactions in speeded classification: tests of the semantic coding hypothesis.
    Martino G; Marks LE
    Perception; 1999; 28(7):903-23. PubMed ID: 10664781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interactions Between Auditory Elevation, Auditory Pitch and Visual Elevation During Multisensory Perception.
    Jamal Y; Lacey S; Nygaard L; Sathian K
    Multisens Res; 2017 Jan; 30(3-5):287-306. PubMed ID: 31287081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Listening natively across perceptual domains?
    Langus A; Seyed-Allaei S; Uysal E; Pirmoradian S; Marino C; Asaadi S; Eren Ö; Toro JM; Peña M; Bion RA; Nespor M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1127-39. PubMed ID: 26820498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Audio-Visual, Visuo-Tactile and Audio-Tactile Correspondences in Preschoolers.
    Nava E; Grassi M; Turati C
    Multisens Res; 2016; 29(1-3):93-111. PubMed ID: 27311292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Event-related potential evidence of processing lexical pitch-accent in auditory Japanese sentences.
    Koso A; Hagiwara H
    Neuroreport; 2009 Sep; 20(14):1270-4. PubMed ID: 19633583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are crossmodal correspondences relative or absolute? Sequential effects on speeded classification.
    Brunetti R; Indraccolo A; Del Gatto C; Spence C; Santangelo V
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):527-534. PubMed ID: 29116614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual influence of auditory pitch on motion speed.
    Zhang G; Wang W; Qu J; Li H; Song X; Wang Q
    J Vis; 2021 Sep; 21(10):11. PubMed ID: 34520509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.