BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23155864)

  • 1. Air impacts from three alternatives for producing JP-8 jet fuel.
    Kositkanawuth K; Gangupomu RH; Sattler ML; Dennis BH; MacDonnell FM; Billo R; Priest JW
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Oct; 62(10):1182-95. PubMed ID: 23155864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis and comparison of inertinite-derived adsorbent with conventional adsorbents.
    Gangupomu RH; Kositkanawuth K; Sattler ML; Ramirez D; Dennis BH; MacDonnell FM; Billo R; Priest JW
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 May; 62(5):489-99. PubMed ID: 22696799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combustion characteristics and air pollutant formation during oxy-fuel co-combustion of microalgae and lignite.
    Gao Y; Tahmasebi A; Dou J; Yu J
    Bioresour Technol; 2016 May; 207():276-84. PubMed ID: 26894568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combustion emissions from refining lower quality oil: what is the global warming potential?
    Karras G
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Dec; 44(24):9584-9. PubMed ID: 21114339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of fuel-cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions for Fischer-Tropsch diesel from coal and cellulosic biomass.
    Xie X; Wang M; Han J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Apr; 45(7):3047-53. PubMed ID: 21370852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Well-to-Wheels Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Canadian Oil Sands Products: Implications for U.S. Petroleum Fuels.
    Cai H; Brandt AR; Yeh S; Englander JG; Han J; Elgowainy A; Wang MQ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(13):8219-27. PubMed ID: 26054375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unconventional Heavy Oil Growth and Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
    Nduagu EI; Gates ID
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(14):8824-32. PubMed ID: 26114481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Environmental and economic evaluation of bioenergy in Ontario, Canada.
    Zhang Y; Habibi S; MacLean HL
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2007 Aug; 57(8):919-33. PubMed ID: 17824282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Model to investigate energy and greenhouse gas emissions implications of refining petroleum: impacts of crude quality and refinery configuration.
    Abella JP; Bergerson JA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Dec; 46(24):13037-47. PubMed ID: 23013493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Total life cycle emissions of post-Panamax containerships powered by conventional fuel or natural gas.
    Hua J; Cheng CW; Hwang DS
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2019 Feb; 69(2):131-144. PubMed ID: 30067463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biofuel Options for Marine Applications: Technoeconomic and Life-Cycle Analyses.
    Tan ECD; Hawkins TR; Lee U; Tao L; Meyer PA; Wang M; Thompson T
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Jun; 55(11):7561-7570. PubMed ID: 33998807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Criteria Air Pollutant and Greenhouse Gases Emissions from U.S. Refineries Allocated to Refinery Products.
    Sun P; Young B; Elgowainy A; Lu Z; Wang M; Morelli B; Hawkins T
    Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Jun; 53(11):6556-6569. PubMed ID: 31051076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Energy efficiency and greenhouse gas emission intensity of petroleum products at U.S. refineries.
    Elgowainy A; Han J; Cai H; Wang M; Forman GS; DiVita VB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(13):7612-24. PubMed ID: 24869918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Co-combustion of coal processing waste, oil refining waste and municipal solid waste: Mechanism, characteristics, emissions.
    Glushkov DO; Paushkina KK; Shabardin DP
    Chemosphere; 2020 Feb; 240():124892. PubMed ID: 31546192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Active methods of mercury removal from flue gases.
    Marczak M; Budzyń S; Szczurowski J; Kogut K; Burmistrz P
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Mar; 26(9):8383-8392. PubMed ID: 29572741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing the greenhouse gas emissions from three alternative waste combustion concepts.
    Vainikka P; Tsupari E; Sipilä K; Hupa M
    Waste Manag; 2012 Mar; 32(3):426-37. PubMed ID: 22079250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Emissions from carpet combustion in a pilot-scale rotary kiln: comparison with coal and particle-board combustion.
    Konopa SL; Mulholland JA; Realff MJ; Lemieux PM
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2008 Aug; 58(8):1070-6. PubMed ID: 18720656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Emissions from the combustion of high-potential slurry fuels.
    Nyashina G; Dorokhov V; Kuznetsov G; Strizhak P
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(25):37989-38005. PubMed ID: 35067879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Life cycle flaring emissions mitigation potential of a novel Fischer-Tropsch gas-to-liquid microreactor technology for synthetic crude oil production.
    Rangel GP; Martinho RM; Dias LB; Coelho FS; Neto B
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 May; 822():153647. PubMed ID: 35124027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Models to predict emissions of health-damaging pollutants and global warming contributions of residential fuel/stove combinations in China.
    Edwards RD; Smith KR; Zhang J; Ma Y
    Chemosphere; 2003 Jan; 50(2):201-15. PubMed ID: 12653292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.