99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23156015)
1. Get on board with the research ethics review process.
Cummings L
Can Nurse; 2012 Oct; 108(8):28-33. PubMed ID: 23156015
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Institutional review board use among dermatology researchers.
Adams BB; Gloster HM
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2007 Feb; 56(2):346. PubMed ID: 17224377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reporting of ethical review of clinical research submitted to the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
Perkins AC; Choi JM; Kimball AB
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2007 Feb; 56(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 17224370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The institutional review board: a brief history of attempts to protect human subjects in research.
Buelow PA
Clin Nurse Spec; 2011; 25(6):277-80. PubMed ID: 22016013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Research and quality improvement activities: when is institutional review board review needed?
McNett M; Lawry K
J Neurosci Nurs; 2009 Dec; 41(6):344-7. PubMed ID: 19998686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Considerations of the institutional review board in artificial organ development.
Bosso JA
J Contemp Law; 1984; 11(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 17076041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Faculty guide to the institutional review board process.
Kaktins NM
Nurse Educ; 2009; 34(6):244-8. PubMed ID: 19901736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Innovative care, medical research, and the ethics of informed consent.
Choi JM; Salter SA; Kimball AB
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2007 Feb; 56(2):330-2. PubMed ID: 17224375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Protection of research subjects.
Kaufman JL
N Engl J Med; 2003 Jul; 349(2):188-92. PubMed ID: 12853595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The institutional review board: purpose and process.
Westlake C; Taha AA
Clin Nurse Spec; 2012; 26(2):66-70. PubMed ID: 22336931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Impediments to "T2" research: are ethics really to blame?
Lipworth W; Kerridge I
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(8):39-40. PubMed ID: 20694906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [A welcome guide for evaluating medical research involving human subjects].
Borst-Eilers E
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 May; 147(19):898-900. PubMed ID: 12768802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vulnerable subjects and civic professionalism: would six-sigma research and research ethics consultation solve the vulnerability problem?
Marshall MF
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):54-5; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethics and morality in midwifery research.
Renfrew MJ
Midwives Chron; 1989 Jun; 102(1217):198-202. PubMed ID: 2747572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. IRB review of case reports.
Didlake R; Cannon CR
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Dec; 139(6):871; author reply 871-2. PubMed ID: 19041525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The ethics of research ethics committees.
Gallagher A
Nurs Ethics; 2010 Nov; 17(6):683-4. PubMed ID: 21097965
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Multicenter trials and subject eligibility: should local IRBs play a role?
Freedman B
IRB; 1994; 16(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Revised recommendations of the NCBHR Report on Research Involving Children.
National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada)
NCBHR Commun; 1993; 4(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 11659942
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The challenged but indispensable role of ethical committees for human clinical experimentation.
Tognoni G
Cortex; 2015 Oct; 71():420-2. PubMed ID: 26026706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethics.
Rosenfeld RM
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 May; 138(5):549-51. PubMed ID: 18439456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
