These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2315636)
1. [Quality criteria for intra-oral roentgen images]. Jung T Rontgenblatter; 1990 Jan; 43(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 2315636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The advantages and drawbacks of x-ray methods in dental and periodontal diseases and the problems of standardizing x-ray study in therapeutic dentistry]. Rabukhina NA; Panina NS; Zhibitskaia EI; Stepanova IG; Vinichenko IuA Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1988; 67(5):82-3. PubMed ID: 3212816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality assurance: 2. The image receptor, the darkroom and processing. Horner K Dent Update; 1992 Apr; 19(3):120, 122-4, 126. PubMed ID: 1291369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Panoramic radiography in current practice]. Danhiez P Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1972; 19(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 4510111 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Contribution to the standardization of intraoral radiography technics]. Erle A; Landeck E; Nenning K; Rother U; Baum A Stomatol DDR; 1980 Jan; 30(1):50-1. PubMed ID: 6932115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of the radiologic index of Enelberger, Marthaler and Rateitsckak in the light of our own studies]. Mitrega J Czas Stomatol; 1968 Jan; 21(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 5240386 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Radiodiagnosis of tooth diseases, periodontosis and parodontosis (lecture)]. Rabukhina NA; Arzhantsev AP Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1994; (3):40-5. PubMed ID: 7985369 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of the darkroom in radiograph quality control. Wolfgang L N Y State Dent J; 1998; 64(6):26-9. PubMed ID: 9707980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Parameters of radiologic care: An official report of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. White SC; Heslop EW; Hollender LG; Mosier KM; Ruprecht A; Shrout MK; Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 May; 91(5):498-511. PubMed ID: 11346726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A clinical evaluation of proposed panoramic surveys using fine detail imaging. Dental magnification radiography versus rotational panoramic radiography. Jensen TW; Eilers G Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1983; 12(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 6584365 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [A comparative study about the quality difference of bitewing-xrays made by the long and short cone technic]. van de Poel AC; Duinkerke AS; Doesburg WH Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1973 Mar; 80(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 4512156 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [The role of x-ray films in diagnosis in operative dentistry]. Sonnabend E Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 Nov; 45(11):691-5. PubMed ID: 2269082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Optimal dental radiography by means of expert film processing]. Horn C Stomatol DDR; 1978 Oct; 28(10):739-46. PubMed ID: 282693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality control of the automatic processor. Legg LM Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2001 Feb; 22(2):135-8, 140-2; quiz 144. PubMed ID: 11911065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Significance of panoramic demonstration in tooth maintenance and periodontics]. Sonnabend E; Ring A Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1972 Dec; 27(12):965-9. PubMed ID: 4510039 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative sensitometric x-ray film study. Fleming RD Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1971 May; 31(5):701-18. PubMed ID: 5280240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]