These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1488 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23156615)

  • 1. Heavy-truck drivers' following behavior with intervention of an integrated, in-vehicle crash warning system: a field evaluation.
    Bao S; LeBlanc DJ; Sayer JR; Flannagan C
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):687-97. PubMed ID: 23156615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fatal crash between a car operating with automated control systems and a tractor-semitrailer truck.
    Poland K; McKay MP; Bruce D; Becic E
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S153-S156. PubMed ID: 30841795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Truck drivers' opinion on road safety in Tanzania--a questionnaire study.
    Kircher K; Andersson J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 23259525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigation on occupant injury severity in rear-end crashes involving trucks as the front vehicle in Beijing area, China.
    Yuan Q; Lu M; Theofilatos A; Li YB
    Chin J Traumatol; 2017 Feb; 20(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 28162916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of off-path glances: A quantitative analysis of rear-end conflicts involving Chinese professional truck drivers as the striking partners.
    Pipkorn L; Bianchi Piccinini G
    J Safety Res; 2020 Feb; 72():259-266. PubMed ID: 32199571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of peripheral transverse line markings on drivers' speed and headway choice and crash risk in car-following: A naturalistic observation study.
    Ding N; Zhu S; Jiao N; Liu B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Oct; 146():105701. PubMed ID: 32823033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling rear-end collisions including the role of driver's visibility and light truck vehicles using a nested logit structure.
    Abdel-Aty M; Abdelwahab H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2004 May; 36(3):447-56. PubMed ID: 15003590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Eye movement and brake reactions to real world brake-capacity forward collision warnings--a naturalistic driving study.
    Wege C; Will S; Victor T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Sep; 58():259-70. PubMed ID: 23068426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Increase in rear-end collision risk by acute stress-induced fatigue in on-road truck driving.
    Minusa S; Mizuno K; Ojiro D; Tanaka T; Kuriyama H; Yamano E; Kuratsune H; Watanabe Y
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258892. PubMed ID: 34673839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experiences of model year 2011 Dodge and Jeep owners with collision avoidance and related technologies.
    Cicchino JB; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():298-303. PubMed ID: 24983299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving.
    Scott JJ; Gray R
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):264-75. PubMed ID: 18516837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Driving with a partially autonomous forward collision warning system: how do drivers react?
    Muhrer E; Reinprecht K; Vollrath M
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):698-708. PubMed ID: 23156616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of effects of driver's evasive action time on rear-end collision risk using a driving simulator.
    Shah D; Lee C
    J Safety Res; 2021 Sep; 78():242-250. PubMed ID: 34399920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing crash risk considering vehicle interactions with trucks using point detector data.
    Hyun KK; Jeong K; Tok A; Ritchie SG
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Sep; 130():75-83. PubMed ID: 29544655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A synthetic approach to compare the large truck crash causation study and naturalistic driving data.
    Hickman JS; Hanowski RJ; Bocanegra J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Mar; 112():11-14. PubMed ID: 29306085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analyzing driver injury severity in two-vehicle rear-end crashes considering leading-following configurations based on passenger car and light truck involvement.
    Zou R; Yang H; Yu W; Yu H; Chen C; Zhang G; Ma DT
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Dec; 193():107298. PubMed ID: 37738845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of front crash prevention systems in reducing large truck real-world crash rates.
    Teoh ER
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(4):284-289. PubMed ID: 33769151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of an integrated collision warning system on teenage driver behavior.
    Jermakian JS; Bao S; Buonarosa ML; Sayer JR; Farmer CM
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():65-75. PubMed ID: 28454872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are front crash prevention systems less effective at preventing rear-end crashes where trucks and motorcycles are struck?
    Cicchino JB; Kidd DG
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(3):440-444. PubMed ID: 38466620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of work zone rear-end crash risk for different vehicle-following patterns.
    Weng J; Meng Q; Yan X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Nov; 72():449-57. PubMed ID: 25150525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 75.