These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
594 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23156621)
1. Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state. Merat N; Jamson AH; Lai FC; Carsten O Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):762-71. PubMed ID: 23156621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Asleep at the automated wheel-Sleepiness and fatigue during highly automated driving. Vogelpohl T; Kühn M; Hummel T; Vollrath M Accid Anal Prev; 2019 May; 126():70-84. PubMed ID: 29571975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving. Zeeb K; Buchner A; Schrauf M Accid Anal Prev; 2015 May; 78():212-221. PubMed ID: 25794922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fatigue and voluntary utilization of automation in simulated driving. Neubauer C; Matthews G; Langheim L; Saxby D Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):734-46. PubMed ID: 23156619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Control task substitution in semiautomated driving: does it matter what aspects are automated? Carsten O; Lai FC; Barnard Y; Jamson AH; Merat N Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):747-61. PubMed ID: 23156620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing drivers' response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks. Shen S; Neyens DM J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():149-155. PubMed ID: 28454860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In a heart beat: Using driver's physiological changes to determine the quality of a takeover in highly automated vehicles. Alrefaie MT; Summerskill S; Jackon TW Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Oct; 131():180-190. PubMed ID: 31302486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Takeover Time in Highly Automated Vehicles: Noncritical Transitions to and From Manual Control. Eriksson A; Stanton NA Hum Factors; 2017 Jun; 59(4):689-705. PubMed ID: 28124573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of an Additional Task During Level 2 Automated Driving: An On-Road Study Comparing Drivers With and Without Experience With Partial Automation. Solís-Marcos I; Ahlström C; Kircher K Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):778-792. PubMed ID: 29791201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. From partial and high automation to manual driving: Relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance. Naujoks F; Höfling S; Purucker C; Zeeb K Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Dec; 121():28-42. PubMed ID: 30205284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of scheduled manual driving on drowsiness and response to take over request: A simulator study towards understanding drivers in automated driving. Wu Y; Kihara K; Takeda Y; Sato T; Akamatsu M; Kitazaki S Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Mar; 124():202-209. PubMed ID: 30665055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation. Wright TJ; Agrawal R; Samuel S; Wang Y; Zilberstein S; Fisher DL Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the impact of on-road partially-automated driving on drivers' cognitive workload and attention allocation. Biondi FN; Jajo N Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Jun; 200():107537. PubMed ID: 38471237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of conversation on situation awareness and working memory in simulated driving. Heenan A; Herdman CM; Brown MS; Robert N Hum Factors; 2014 Sep; 56(6):1077-92. PubMed ID: 25277018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of Task-Induced Fatigue in Prolonged Conditional Automated Driving. Jarosch O; Bellem H; Bengler K Hum Factors; 2019 Nov; 61(7):1186-1199. PubMed ID: 30657711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of self-regulation in the context of driver distraction: A simulator study. Wandtner B; Schumacher M; Schmidt EA Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Jul; 17(5):472-9. PubMed ID: 27082493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Understanding take-over performance of high crash risk drivers during conditionally automated driving. Lin Q; Li S; Ma X; Lu G Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Aug; 143():105543. PubMed ID: 32485431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transition to manual: Comparing simulator with on-road control transitions. Eriksson A; Banks VA; Stanton NA Accid Anal Prev; 2017 May; 102():227-234. PubMed ID: 28342410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Age-related differences in effects of non-driving related tasks on takeover performance in automated driving. Wu Y; Kihara K; Hasegawa K; Takeda Y; Sato T; Akamatsu M; Kitazaki S J Safety Res; 2020 Feb; 72():231-238. PubMed ID: 32199568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Coming back into the loop: Drivers' perceptual-motor performance in critical events after automated driving. Louw T; Markkula G; Boer E; Madigan R; Carsten O; Merat N Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Nov; 108():9-18. PubMed ID: 28837837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]