These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23156622)

  • 1. An adaptive driver support system: user experiences and driving performance in a simulator.
    Dijksterhuis C; Stuiver A; Mulder B; Brookhuis KA; de Waard D
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):772-85. PubMed ID: 23156622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adverse Behavioral Adaptation to Adaptive Forward Collision Warning Systems: An Investigation of Primary and Secondary Task Performance.
    Reinmueller K; Kiesel A; Steinhauser M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Oct; 146():105718. PubMed ID: 32847736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Should drivers be operating within an automation-free bandwidth? Evaluating haptic steering support systems with different levels of authority.
    Petermeijer SM; Abbink DA; de Winter JC
    Hum Factors; 2015 Feb; 57(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 25790567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human-factors engineering for smart transport: design support for car drivers and train traffic controllers.
    Lenior D; Janssen W; Neerincx M; Schreibers K
    Appl Ergon; 2006 Jul; 37(4):479-90. PubMed ID: 16765905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of road surface appearance and low friction warning systems on driver behaviour and confidence in the warning system.
    Kircher K; Thorslund B
    Ergonomics; 2009 Feb; 52(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 18937091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sharing control with haptics: seamless driver support from manual to automatic control.
    Mulder M; Abbink DA; Boer ER
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):786-98. PubMed ID: 23156623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness and driver acceptance of a semi-autonomous forward obstacle collision avoidance system.
    Itoh M; Horikome T; Inagaki T
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Sep; 44(5):756-63. PubMed ID: 23453775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simulator training with a forward collision warning system: effects on driver-system interactions and driver trust.
    Koustanaï A; Cavallo V; Delhomme P; Mas A
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):709-21. PubMed ID: 23156617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does haptic steering guidance instigate speeding? A driving simulator study into causes and remedies.
    Melman T; de Winter JC; Abbink DA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jan; 98():372-387. PubMed ID: 27865119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of lane width, shoulder width, and road cross-sectional reallocation on drivers' behavioral adaptations.
    Mecheri S; Rosey F; Lobjois R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jul; 104():65-73. PubMed ID: 28486150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lateral control assistance for car drivers: a comparison of motor priming and warning systems.
    Navarro J; Mars F; Hoc JM
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):950-60. PubMed ID: 17915609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating driver drowsiness countermeasures.
    Gaspar JG; Brown TL; Schwarz CW; Lee JD; Kang J; Higgins JS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S58-S63. PubMed ID: 28323444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preface to the special section on human factors and automation in vehicles: designing highly automated vehicles with the driver in mind.
    Merat N; Lee JD
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):681-6. PubMed ID: 23156614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design and evaluation of steering protection for avoiding collisions during a lane change.
    Itoh M; Inagaki T
    Ergonomics; 2014; 57(3):361-73. PubMed ID: 24206200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In-vehicle displays to support driver anticipation of traffic conflicts in automated vehicles.
    He D; Kanaan D; Donmez B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jan; 149():105842. PubMed ID: 33157393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trust in smart systems: sharing driving goals and giving information to increase trustworthiness and acceptability of smart systems in cars.
    Verberne FM; Ham J; Midden CJ
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):799-810. PubMed ID: 23156624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use patterns among early adopters of adaptive cruise control.
    Xiong H; Boyle LN; Moeckli J; Dow BR; Brown TL
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):722-33. PubMed ID: 23156618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Volvo drivers' experiences with advanced crash avoidance and related technologies.
    Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 24345022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of directional speech warnings on road hazard detection.
    Serrano J; Di Stasi LL; Megías A; Catena A
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Dec; 12(6):630-5. PubMed ID: 22133340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of steering demand on lane keeping behaviour, self-reports, and physiology. A simulator study.
    Dijksterhuis C; Brookhuis KA; De Waard D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):1074-81. PubMed ID: 21376904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.