These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23156811)

  • 1. [A meta-analysis compare rapid rhino with merocel for nasal packing].
    Yang X; Yi K; Tian J; Guo Y
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jul; 26(14):655-60. PubMed ID: 23156811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapid Rhino versus Merocel nasal packs in septal surgery.
    Hesham A; Ghali A
    J Laryngol Otol; 2011 Dec; 125(12):1244-6. PubMed ID: 21854674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of rapid rhino and merocel nasal packs in endonasal septal surgery.
    Ozcan C; Vayisoglu Y; Kiliç S; Görür K
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Dec; 37(6):826-31. PubMed ID: 19128711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomized controlled trial comparing Merocel and RapidRhino packing in the management of anterior epistaxis.
    Badran K; Malik TH; Belloso A; Timms MS
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2005 Aug; 30(4):333-7. PubMed ID: 16209675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of side effects and patient perceptions towards Rapid Rhino and Merocel packs in epistaxis.
    Mettias B; Karia CT; Irvine E; Conboy P
    J Laryngol Otol; 2024 Jun; 138(6):642-646. PubMed ID: 38230503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Double-blind randomised controlled trial comparing Merocel with Rapid Rhino nasal packs after routine nasal surgery.
    Arya AK; Butt O; Nigam A
    Rhinology; 2003 Dec; 41(4):241-3. PubMed ID: 14750352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of nasal tampons for the treatment of epistaxis in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial.
    Singer AJ; Blanda M; Cronin K; LoGiudice-Khwaja M; Gulla J; Bradshaw J; Katz A
    Ann Emerg Med; 2005 Feb; 45(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15671968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "Double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing Merocel with Rapid Rhino nasal packs after routine nasal surgery".
    Ho WK
    Rhinology; 2004 Dec; 42(4):255; author reply 255. PubMed ID: 15626265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative study of gloved versus ungloved merocel
    Kaur J; Singh M; Kaur I; Singh A; Goyal S
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1391-1395. PubMed ID: 30417834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized trial of Rapid Rhino Riemann and Telfa nasal packs following endoscopic sinus surgery.
    Cruise AS; Amonoo-Kuofi K; Srouji I; Kanagalingam J; Georgalas C; Patel NN; Badia L; Lund VJ
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2006 Feb; 31(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 16441798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of three different polyvinyl alcohol packs following functional endoscopic Nasal surgery.
    Melis A; Karligkiotis A; Bozzo C; Machouchas N; Volpi L; Castiglia P; Castelnuovo P; Meloni F
    Laryngoscope; 2015 May; 125(5):1067-71. PubMed ID: 25545810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Merocel versus Nasopore for nasal packing: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Wang J; Cai C; Wang S
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e93959. PubMed ID: 24710428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Foam nasal packs: a prospective, randomised, patient-controlled study.
    Prabhu V; Kaushik V; Rhodes S; Tay H
    Rhinology; 2007 Sep; 45(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 17956027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing Merocel and Rapid Rhino nasal tampons in the treatment of epistaxis.
    Moumoulidis I; Draper MR; Patel H; Jani P; Price T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Aug; 263(8):719-22. PubMed ID: 16685543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intranasal packs and haemostatic agents for the management of adult epistaxis: systematic review.
    Iqbal IZ; Jones GH; Dawe N; Mamais C; Smith ME; Williams RJ; Kuhn I; Carrie S
    J Laryngol Otol; 2017 Dec; 131(12):1065-1092. PubMed ID: 29280695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of Surgicel Nu-knit, Merocel and Vasolene gauze nasal packs: a randomized trial.
    Shinkwin CA; Beasley N; Simo R; Rushton L; Jones NS
    Rhinology; 1996 Mar; 34(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 8739869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of polyvinyl acetal sponge nasal packing on post-operative care of nasal polyposis patients: a randomised, controlled, partly blinded study.
    Saedi B; Sadeghi M; Farschi S
    J Laryngol Otol; 2012 Apr; 126(4):380-4. PubMed ID: 22310061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of Merocel and Series 5000 nasal packs in patients following nasal surgery: a prospective randomised trial.
    Bresnihan M; Mehigan B; Curran A
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2007 Oct; 32(5):352-5. PubMed ID: 17883554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of Merocel nasal packs in the treatment of epistaxis.
    Pringle MB; Beasley P; Brightwell AP
    J Laryngol Otol; 1996 Jun; 110(6):543-6. PubMed ID: 8763373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rapid Rhino nasal packs: demonstration of depressurisation but not deflation.
    Smyth C; Hanna B; Scally C
    J Laryngol Otol; 2009 May; 123(5):522-7. PubMed ID: 18926004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.