288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23157084)
21. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway supreme and laryngeal mask airway proseal for laryngopharyngeal trauma and postoperative morbidity in children.
Aydogmus MT; Eksioglu B; Oba S; Unsal O; Türk HS; Sinikoglu SN; Tug A
Braz J Anesthesiol; 2013; 63(6):445-9. PubMed ID: 24565340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [First clinical impressions of ProSeal laryngeal mask].
Murashima K; Yoshino H; Matsumoto T; Fukutome T
Masui; 2002 Jun; 51(6):677-82. PubMed ID: 12134664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal and Classic laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients.
Brimacombe J; Keller C; Fullekrug B; Agrò F; Rosenblatt W; Dierdorf SF; Garcia de Lucas E; Capdevilla X; Brimacombe N
Anesthesiology; 2002 Feb; 96(2):289-95. PubMed ID: 11818758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The size 1(1/2) ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, crossover investigation with the Classic laryngeal mask airway.
Goldmann K; Roettger C; Wulf H
Anesth Analg; 2006 Feb; 102(2):405-10. PubMed ID: 16428533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of the LMA Supreme™ with the LMA Proseal™ for airway management in patients anaesthetized in prone position.
López AM; Valero R; Hurtado P; Gambús P; Pons M; Anglada T
Br J Anaesth; 2011 Aug; 107(2):265-71. PubMed ID: 21576096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison and evaluation of single-use LMA supreme versus the reusable proseal LMA in paralyzed patients undergoing surgery with controlled ventilation.
Sood S; Chahar S; Thakur A; Gupta M; Saxena A; Subramanian S
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2020; 36(4):494-499. PubMed ID: 33840930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of the clinical performance of i-gel, LMA Supreme and LMA ProSeal in elective surgery.
Liew GH; Yu ED; Shah SS; Kothandan H
Singapore Med J; 2016 Aug; 57(8):432-7. PubMed ID: 27549212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Evaluation of 13 cases of upper airway obstruction caused by laryngeal mask ProSeal, improved by other types of laryngeal mask airway].
Uesugi T; Tanimoto M
Masui; 2012 Jun; 61(6):588-94. PubMed ID: 22746020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Size 2 ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover investigation with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paediatric patients.
Goldmann K; Jakob C
Br J Anaesth; 2005 Mar; 94(3):385-9. PubMed ID: 15591332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Proseal laryngeal mask airway in children: a comparison between two insertion techniques.
Teoh CY; Lim FS
Paediatr Anaesth; 2008 Feb; 18(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 18184242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Performance of the PAxpress vs the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway during general anesthesia.
Lallo A; Drolet P; Lacroix M
Can J Anaesth; 2007 Jan; 54(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 17197465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Laryngeal mask airway ProSeal provides higher oropharyngeal leak pressure than i-gel in adult patients under general anesthesia: a meta-analysis.
Maitra S; Baidya DK; Arora MK; Bhattacharjee S; Khanna P
J Clin Anesth; 2016 Sep; 33():298-305. PubMed ID: 27555181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Supreme™ laryngeal mask airway insertion requires a lower concentration of sevoflurane than ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway insertion during target-controlled remifentanil infusion: a prospective randomised controlled study.
Monteserín-Matesanz C; González T; Anadón-Baselga MJ; Zaballos M
BMC Anesthesiol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):5. PubMed ID: 31910822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme for positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Beleña JM; Gracia JL; Ayala JL; Núñez M; Lorenzo JA; de los Reyes A; Pérez JL; Yuste J
J Clin Anesth; 2011 Sep; 23(6):456-60. PubMed ID: 21911191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Laryngeal tube S II, ProSeal laryngeal mask, and EasyTube during elective surgery: a randomized controlled comparison with the endotracheal tube in nontrained professionals.
Cavus E; Deitmer W; Francksen H; Serocki G; Bein B; Scholz J; Doerges V
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Sep; 26(9):730-5. PubMed ID: 19373095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A cohort evaluation of the laryngeal mask airway-Supreme™ in children.
Jagannathan N; Sohn LE; Chang E; Sawardekar A
Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Aug; 22(8):759-64. PubMed ID: 22416790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of LMA Unique, Ambu laryngeal mask and Soft Seal laryngeal mask during routine surgical procedures.
Francksen H; Bein B; Cavus E; Renner J; Scholz J; Steinfath M; Tonner PH; Doerges V
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2007 Feb; 24(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 16895620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Comparison of the efficacy of different types of laryngeal mask airways in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery].
Shi YB; Zuo MZ; Du XH; Yu Z
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Jul; 93(25):1978-80. PubMed ID: 24169248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of disposable and reusable laryngeal mask airways in spontaneously ventilating adult patients.
Cao MM; Webb T; Bjorksten AR
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2004 Aug; 32(4):530-4. PubMed ID: 15675213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Randomised crossover comparison of the Ambu AuraOnce Laryngeal Mask with the LMA Classic laryngeal mask airway in paralysed anaesthetised patients.
Shariffuddin II; Wang CY
Anaesthesia; 2008 Jan; 63(1):82-5. PubMed ID: 18086075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
