These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23157651)
21. Reconstruction of isolated mandibular bone defects with non-vascularized corticocancellous bone autograft and graft viability. Akbay E; Aydogan F Auris Nasus Larynx; 2014 Feb; 41(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 23910898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Found in space: computer-assisted orthognathic alignment of a total face allograft in six degrees of freedom. Dorafshar AH; Brazio PS; Mundinger GS; Mohan R; Brown EN; Rodriguez ED J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 72(9):1788-800. PubMed ID: 24656428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Complications of intraoral donor site for bone grafting prior to implant placement. Silva FM; Cortez AL; Moreira RW; Mazzonetto R Implant Dent; 2006 Dec; 15(4):420-6. PubMed ID: 17172961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Position of mandibular canal and ramus morphology before and after sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Ueki K; Okabe K; Miyazaki M; Mukozawa A; Marukawa K; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Aug; 68(8):1795-801. PubMed ID: 20044190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Surgical planning and microvascular reconstruction of the mandible with a fibular flap using computer-aided design, rapid prototype modelling, and precontoured titanium reconstruction plates: a prospective study. Sieira Gil R; Roig AM; Obispo CA; Morla A; Pagès CM; Perez JL Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 53(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 25305795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Application of computer aided design-computer aided manufacture technique in mandible defect reconstruction with individual titanium prosthesis]. Xu X; Yan JL; Ping FY; Chen J; Yan FG; Shan YD Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Jul; 46(7):422-4. PubMed ID: 22041632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Significance of ramus measurement through computed tomography in the sagittal split osteotomy of the ramus]. Ma J; Li BH; Lu L Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Sep; 24(5):353-6. PubMed ID: 19119634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The mandibular symphysis as a donor site in maxillofacial bone grafting: a quantitative anatomic study. Montazem A; Valauri DV; St-Hilaire H; Buchbinder D J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Dec; 58(12):1368-71. PubMed ID: 11117684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparative volumetric study of symphysis donor defects, unfilled or filled with bone substitute. Schwartz-Arad D; Toti P; Levin L; Laviv A; Guidetti F; Sbordone L Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Oct; 15(5):684-91. PubMed ID: 22008097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mandibular cortical bone grafts part 1: anatomy, healing process, and influencing factors. Aalam AA; Nowzari H Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2007 Apr; 28(4):206-12; quiz 213. PubMed ID: 17487046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ridge augmentation using mandibular ramus bone grafts for the placement of dental implants: presentation of a technique. Misch CM Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1996 Mar; 8(2):127-35; quiz 138. PubMed ID: 9028286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Error analysis of a CAD/CAM method for unidirectional mandibular distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of hemifacial microsomia. Sun H; Li B; Zhao Z; Zhang L; Shen SG; Wang X Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):892-7. PubMed ID: 23583007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Radiographic considerations for the regional anatomy in the posterior mandible. Yashar N; Engeland CG; Rosenfeld AL; Walsh TP; Califano JV J Periodontol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 21542732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of intraoral donor sites for onlay grafting prior to implant placement. Misch CM Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):767-76. PubMed ID: 9425757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Mandibular symphysis and ramus as sources of osteoblastic cells for bone tissue engineering. Ferraz EP; Xavier SP; de Oliveira PT; Beloti MM; Rosa AI Oral Dis; 2014 Apr; 20(3):e31-5. PubMed ID: 23607403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Computed tomography and computer-aided design for locating available palatal bone for grafting: two case reports. Rodriguez-Recio O; Rodriguez-Recio C; Gallego L; Junquera L Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):197-200. PubMed ID: 20209202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Safe zone for bone harvesting from the interforaminal region of the mandible. Al-Ani O; Nambiar P; Ha KO; Ngeow WC Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():115-21. PubMed ID: 22233422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessment of therapy responses and prediction of survival in malignant pleural mesothelioma through computer-aided volumetric measurement on computed tomography scans. Liu F; Zhao B; Krug LM; Ishill NM; Lim RC; Guo P; Gorski M; Flores R; Moskowitz CS; Rusch VW; Schwartz LH J Thorac Oncol; 2010 Jun; 5(6):879-84. PubMed ID: 20421814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Differences in bone remodeling using demineralized bone matrix in bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a study on volumetric analysis using three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography. Lee BS; Ohe JY; Kim BK J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 72(6):1151-7. PubMed ID: 24480774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Mandibular bone harvesting for alveolar reconstruction and implant placement: subjective and objective cross-sectional evaluation of donor and recipient site up to 4 years. Cordaro L; Torsello F; Miuccio MT; di Torresanto VM; Eliopoulos D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1320-6. PubMed ID: 21443607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]