These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23157667)

  • 1. Comparative effectiveness: beyond the buzz.
    Annemans L
    J Med Econ; 2012; 15(6):1036-8. PubMed ID: 23157667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A look at whether Medicare will consider cost effectiveness when setting reimbursement rates.
    Keating T
    Nephrol News Issues; 2010 Nov; 24(12):16. PubMed ID: 21189748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A little learning: reflections on 10 years of NICE technology appraisals.
    Longson CM
    Health Econ; 2012 Jan; 21(1):30-2. PubMed ID: 22147626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) effective health care (EHC) program methods guide for comparative effectiveness reviews: keeping up-to-date in a rapidly evolving field.
    Chang SM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1166-7. PubMed ID: 21959053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Building sustainable multi-functional prospective electronic clinical data systems.
    Randhawa GS; Slutsky JR
    Med Care; 2012 Jul; 50 Suppl():S3-6. PubMed ID: 22692255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Apples and Oranges? Assessing Comparative Effectiveness and Comparative Value in the US and Other Countries.
    Levy AR; Garrison LP
    Value Health; 2010 Jun; 13 Suppl 1():S1-3. PubMed ID: 20618787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hyperthermia in conjunction with cancer chemotherapy.
    Green I
    Health Technol Assess Rep; 1991; (2):1-16. PubMed ID: 1810352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New trends in technology assessment: will comparative-effectiveness research and healthcare reform stifle medical device innovation?
    Gross L
    J Ambul Care Manage; 2010; 33(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 20838114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Making sense of the evidence using comparative effectiveness to guide clinical decision making, policy and coverage.
    Carlos RC; Cronin P
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Sep; 18(9):1065-6. PubMed ID: 21820633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 'Huge potential' for EHRs and comparative effectiveness.
    McKinney M
    Hosp Health Netw; 2010 Apr; 84(4):41-2. PubMed ID: 20464840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Designing comparative effectiveness research on prescription drugs: lessons from the clinical trial literature.
    Chokshi DA; Avorn J; Kesselheim AS
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2010 Oct; 29(10):1842-8. PubMed ID: 20921484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. AHRQ's free research can help plans anticipate coverage issues.
    Roberts DC; Schoelles K
    Manag Care; 2013 Oct; 22(10):41-4. PubMed ID: 24344527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Electronic Data Methods (EDM) forum for comparative effectiveness research (CER).
    Holve E; Segal C; Lopez MH; Rein A; Johnson BH
    Med Care; 2012 Jul; 50 Suppl():S7-10. PubMed ID: 22692262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Process for health care technology assessments and recommendations for coverage--AHCPR.
    Fed Regist; 1993 Dec; 58(231):63988-91. PubMed ID: 10130785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative effectiveness research: what does it mean for imaging?
    Carlos RC
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1071-2. PubMed ID: 20692618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Technology assessment: scientific challenges.
    Royal HD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):503-7. PubMed ID: 8079834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Science and the stiumulus. A user's guide to cancer treatment.
    Marder J
    Science; 2009 Nov; 326(5957):1184. PubMed ID: 19965448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perspectives. Technology assessment: a stronger federal role?
    Kent C
    Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1991 Dec; 45(48):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10115038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Centers tapped to evaluate technology.
    Moore JD
    Mod Healthc; 1997 Sep; 27(38):20, 22. PubMed ID: 10170392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Health technology assessment and comparative effectiveness in Sweden.
    Jonsson E
    Value Health; 2010 Jun; 13 Suppl 1():S6-7. PubMed ID: 20618795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.