237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23157843)
1. An experimental study of the interface pressure profile during level walking of a new suspension system for lower limb amputees.
Eshraghi A; Abu Osman NA; Gholizadeh H; Ali S; Sævarsson SK; Wan Abas WA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013 Jan; 28(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 23157843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gait biomechanics of individuals with transtibial amputation: effect of suspension system.
Eshraghi A; Abu Osman NA; Karimi M; Gholizadeh H; Soodmand E; Wan Abas WA
PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e96988. PubMed ID: 24865351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vacuum-assisted socket suspension compared with pin suspension for lower extremity amputees: effect on fit, activity, and limb volume.
Klute GK; Berge JS; Biggs W; Pongnumkul S; Popovic Z; Curless B
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Oct; 92(10):1570-5. PubMed ID: 21963124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of suction and pin/lock suspension systems on transtibial amputees' gait performance.
Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Ali S
PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e94520. PubMed ID: 24827560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative and qualitative comparison of a new prosthetic suspension system with two existing suspension systems for lower limb amputees.
Eshraghi A; Abu Osman NA; Karimi MT; Gholizadeh H; Ali S; Wan Abas WA
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Dec; 91(12):1028-38. PubMed ID: 23168378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interface pressure in transtibial socket during ascent and descent on stairs and its effect on patient satisfaction.
Ali S; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Gholizadeh H; Abd Razak NA; Wan Abas WA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013; 28(9-10):994-9. PubMed ID: 24161521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical implication of interface pressure for a new prosthetic suspension system.
Gholizadeh H; Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Abd Razak NA
Biomed Eng Online; 2014 Jun; 13():89. PubMed ID: 24981801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interface stress in socket/residual limb with transtibial prosthetic suspension systems during locomotion on slopes and stairs.
Eshraghi A; Abu Osman NA; Gholizadeh H; Ali S; Abas WA
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Jan; 94(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 24919079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of a prosthetic suspension system: Looped silicone liner.
Abu Osman NA; Gholizadeh H; Eshraghi A; Wan Abas WAB
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Oct; 41(5):476-483. PubMed ID: 28946824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transtibial prosthetic socket pistoning: static evaluation of Seal-In(®) X5 and Dermo(®) Liner using motion analysis system.
Gholizadeh H; Osman NA; Kamyab M; Eshraghi A; Abas WA; Azam MN
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jan; 27(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 21794965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transtibial prosthesis suspension systems: systematic review of literature.
Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Ali S; Razak NA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Jan; 29(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 24315710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shock absorption during transtibial amputee gait: Does longitudinal prosthetic stiffness play a role?
Boutwell E; Stine R; Gard S
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Apr; 41(2):178-185. PubMed ID: 27117010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pressure characteristics at the stump/socket interface in transtibial amputees using an adaptive prosthetic foot.
Wolf SI; Alimusaj M; Fradet L; Siegel J; Braatz F
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Dec; 24(10):860-5. PubMed ID: 19744755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vacuum level effects on gait characteristics for unilateral transtibial amputees with elevated vacuum suspension.
Xu H; Greenland K; Bloswick D; Zhao J; Merryweather A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Mar; 43():95-101. PubMed ID: 28232236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Real time monitoring of transtibial elevated vacuum prostheses: A case series on socket air pressure.
Schoepp KR; Schofield JS; Home D; Dawson MR; Lou E; Keri M; Marasco PD; Hebert JS
PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0202716. PubMed ID: 30346953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stump-socket interface pressure as an aid to socket design in prostheses for trans-femoral amputees--a preliminary study.
Lee VS; Solomonidis SE; Spence WD
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1997; 211(2):167-80. PubMed ID: 9184457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of vacuum and KBM prosthetic fitting for unilateral transtibial amputees using the Gait Profile Score.
Kuntze Ferreira AE; Neves EB
Gait Posture; 2015 Feb; 41(2):683-7. PubMed ID: 25684145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison between the suction suspension system and the hypobaric Iceross Seal-In® X5 in transtibial amputees.
Brunelli S; Delussu AS; Paradisi F; Pellegrini R; Traballesi M
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2013 Dec; 37(6):436-44. PubMed ID: 23436696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interface pressures during ambulation using suction and vacuum-assisted prosthetic sockets.
Beil TL; Street GM; Covey SJ
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2002; 39(6):693-700. PubMed ID: 17943671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of alignment on interface pressure for transtibial amputee during walking.
Jia X; Suo S; Meng F; Wang R
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2008 Nov; 3(6):339-43. PubMed ID: 19127605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
