267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23159002)
1. [Effectiveness and health economic analysis of strategies on cervical cancer screening and early diagnosis and treatment].
Zhao FH; Chen JF; Gao XH; Gao LM; Liu QG; Liu ZH; Xu H; Ma JF; Ma L; Xu XL; Hu SY; Ning Y; Shi JF; Qiao YL
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 Aug; 34(8):632-6. PubMed ID: 23159002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of primary HPV-DNA testing in relation to visual inspection methods for cervical cancer screening in rural China: an epidemiologic and cost-effectiveness modelling study.
Shi JF; Canfell K; Lew JB; Zhao FH; Legood R; Ning Y; Simonella L; Ma L; Kang YJ; Zhang YZ; Smith MA; Chen JF; Feng XX; Qiao YL
BMC Cancer; 2011 Jun; 11():239. PubMed ID: 21668946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Cost-effectiveness analysis on the once-in-a-lifetime cervical cancer screening program for women living in rural and urban areas of China].
Xu H; Zhao FH; Gao XH; Hu SY; Chen JF; Liu ZH; Xu XL; Gao LM; Liu QG; Ma L; Liu YJ; Qiao YL
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Apr; 34(4):399-403. PubMed ID: 23937850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Economic evaluation of fifteen cervical cancer screening strategies in rural China].
Wang YY; Wang ZJ; Zhang Y; Gao XH; Yang CX; Zhao FH; Qiao YL; Ma L; Lang JH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 54(12):840-847. PubMed ID: 31874474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Epidemiologic and Health Economic Evaluation of Cervical Cancer Screening in Rural China.
Zhao F; Wen Y; Li Y; Tao S; Ma L; Zhao Y; Dang L; Wang Y; Zhao F; Lang J; Qiao Y; Yang CX
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2020 May; 21(5):1317-1325. PubMed ID: 32458639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of several screening approaches for detection of cervical lesions in rural Shandong, China.
Zong LJ; Zhang YZ; Yang XS; Jiang J; Cui BX; Qiao YB; Li L; Jiang K; Zhang WJ; Kong BH; Shen K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(5):1907-12. PubMed ID: 25773843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Costs and benefits of different strategies to screen for cervical cancer in less-developed countries.
Mandelblatt JS; Lawrence WF; Gaffikin L; Limpahayom KK; Lumbiganon P; Warakamin S; King J; Yi B; Ringers P; Blumenthal PD
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Oct; 94(19):1469-83. PubMed ID: 12359856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of alternative strategies for primary cervical cancer screening in sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
Fokom-Domgue J; Combescure C; Fokom-Defo V; Tebeu PM; Vassilakos P; Kengne AP; Petignat P
BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3084. PubMed ID: 26142020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benefits and costs of using HPV testing to screen for cervical cancer.
Mandelblatt JS; Lawrence WF; Womack SM; Jacobson D; Yi B; Hwang YT; Gold K; Barter J; Shah K
JAMA; 2002 May; 287(18):2372-81. PubMed ID: 11988058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Costs and Cost Effectiveness of Three Approaches for Cervical Cancer Screening among HIV-Positive Women in Johannesburg, South Africa.
Lince-Deroche N; Phiri J; Michelow P; Smith JS; Firnhaber C
PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0141969. PubMed ID: 26569487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Cost-effectiveness analysis of cervical cancer screening strategies in urban China].
Peng JR; Tao SY; Wen Y; Yang X; Ma JQ; Zhao F; Chen ZY; Zhang GT; Qiao YL; Zhao FH; Yang CX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 41(2):154-160. PubMed ID: 30862148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening in Québec, Canada.
Vijayaraghavan A; Efrusy MB; Mayrand MH; Santas CC; Goggin P
Can J Public Health; 2010; 101(3):220-5. PubMed ID: 20737813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of careHPV for detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia among women living with HIV-1 in Burkina Faso and South Africa: HARP study.
Segondy M; Kelly H; Magooa MP; Djigma F; Ngou J; Gilham C; Omar T; Goumbri-Lompo O; Michelow P; Doutre S; Clavero O; Chikandiwa A; Sawadogo B; Didelot MN; Costes V; Méda N; Delany-Moretlwe S; Mayaud P
Br J Cancer; 2016 Aug; 115(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 27434037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. VIA/VILI is more suitable for cervical cancer prevention in Chinese poverty-stricken region: a health economic evaluation.
Xie Y; Tan X; Shao H; Liu Q; Tou J; Zhang Y; Luo Q; Xiang Q
BMC Public Health; 2017 Jan; 17(1):118. PubMed ID: 28122530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness evaluation of HPV self-testing offered to non-attendees in cervical cancer screening in Switzerland.
Vassilakos P; Poncet A; Catarino R; Viviano M; Petignat P; Combescure C
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 153(1):92-99. PubMed ID: 30718124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Projected cost-effectiveness of repeat high-risk human papillomavirus testing using self-collected vaginal samples in the Swedish cervical cancer screening program.
Östensson E; Hellström AC; Hellman K; Gustavsson I; Gyllensten U; Wilander E; Zethraeus N; Andersson S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Jul; 92(7):830-40. PubMed ID: 23530870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of using human papillomavirus 16/18 genotype triage in cervical cancer screening.
Vijayaraghavan A; Efrusy MB; Goodman KA; Santas CC; Huh WK
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Nov; 119(2):237-42. PubMed ID: 20713299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening of cervical neoplasia in HIV-infected women in India.
Joshi S; Sankaranarayanan R; Muwonge R; Kulkarni V; Somanathan T; Divate U
AIDS; 2013 Feb; 27(4):607-15. PubMed ID: 23079814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of alternative triage strategies for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Kim JJ; Wright TC; Goldie SJ
JAMA; 2002 May; 287(18):2382-90. PubMed ID: 11988059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
