BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23160250)

  • 1. How lawyers view psychiatric experts.
    Reid WH; Skip Simpson JD
    J Psychiatr Pract; 2012 Nov; 18(6):444-7. PubMed ID: 23160250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Psychiatric expert witnesses: proposals for change.
    Needell JE
    Am J Law Med; 1980; 6(3):425-49. PubMed ID: 7468605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The lawyers' crusade against an invented reality].
    Haugen OA; Uhlin-Hansen L; Morild I
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Dec; 128(24):2846-7. PubMed ID: 19092960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Just say no": experts' late withdrawal from cases to preserve independence and objectivity.
    Gutheil TG; Bursztajn H; Hilliard JT; Brodsky A
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(4):390-4. PubMed ID: 15704624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Opinion of the Polish Psychiatric Association Management Office and Polish consultants about the use of forensic psychiatry in expert court testimony].
    Bomba J; Wciórka J; Puzyński S
    Psychiatr Pol; 2004; 38(2):198-200. PubMed ID: 15307285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evolving legal standards for the admissibility of scientific evidence.
    Black B
    Science; 1988 Mar; 239(4847):1508-12. PubMed ID: 3281252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [False forensic expertise--analysis of occurrences].
    Heitzman J
    Psychiatr Pol; 2004; 38(3):385-94. PubMed ID: 15199649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Paraforensic aspects of expert witness practice.
    Gutheil TG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(4):356-8. PubMed ID: 15704617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychiatrists as expert witnesses.
    Gutheil TG
    Am J Psychiatry; 2004 Nov; 161(11):2141. PubMed ID: 15514437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychiatry malpractice and administrative inquiries of alleged physician misconduct.
    Meyer DJ
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 2006 Sep; 29(3):615-28. PubMed ID: 16904502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The psychiatrist as expert witness.
    Diamond BL
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 1983 Dec; 6(4):597-609. PubMed ID: 6364068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The psychiatric expert in court.
    Kenny A
    Psychol Med; 1984 May; 14(2):291-302. PubMed ID: 6739627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychiatric reports for Nigerian courts: an analysis of the views of the bench.
    Ogunlesi AO; Sijuwola OA
    West Afr J Med; 1989; 8(2):122-9. PubMed ID: 2486783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Toward a critical forensic psychiatry.
    Deaton RJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 12875502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review of psychiatric expert testimony. American Psychiatric Association's Council on Psychiatry and Law.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1992; 20(3):343-52. PubMed ID: 1421564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A pilot Rasch scaling of lawyers' perceptions of expert bias.
    Dattilio FM; Commons ML; Adams KM; Gutheil TG; Sadoff RL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(4):482-91. PubMed ID: 17185478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychiatric testimony and the "reasonable person" standard.
    Weiss KJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(4):580-9. PubMed ID: 10638785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Toward the development of guidelines for the conduct of forensic psychiatric examinations.
    Simon RI; Wettstein RM
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 9148880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Assessment of children's reliability in connection with sexual abuse. A complex interplay between the judicial system and expert witnesses].
    Gumpert CH
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Jun; 99(24):2734-8. PubMed ID: 12101598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conclaves and concurrent expert evidence: a positive development in Australian legal practice?
    Madden B; Cockburn T
    Med J Aust; 2016 Feb; 204(2):82-3. PubMed ID: 26821112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.