262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23160474)
1. Comparison of ultrasound attenuation and backscatter estimates in layered tissue-mimicking phantoms among three clinical scanners.
Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Ghoshal G; Pawlicki AD; Madsen EL; Lavarello RJ; Oelze ML; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
Ultrason Imaging; 2012 Oct; 34(4):209-21. PubMed ID: 23160474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Simultaneous backscatter and attenuation estimation using a least squares method with constraints.
Nam K; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Dec; 37(12):2096-104. PubMed ID: 21963038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cross-imaging system comparison of backscatter coefficient estimates from a tissue-mimicking material.
Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Kumar V; Madsen EL; Ghoshal G; Pawlicki AD; Oelze ML; Lavarello RJ; Bigelow TA; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1319-24. PubMed ID: 22978860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter coefficient estimates of rodent-tumor-mimicking structures: comparison of results among clinical scanners.
Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Pawlicki AD; Kumar V; Madsen EL; Ghoshal G; Lavarello RJ; Oelze ML; Bigelow TA; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
Ultrason Imaging; 2011 Oct; 33(4):233-50. PubMed ID: 22518954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative assessment of in vivo breast masses using ultrasound attenuation and backscatter.
Nam K; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Apr; 35(2):146-61. PubMed ID: 23493613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Techniques and evaluation from a cross-platform imaging comparison of quantitative ultrasound parameters in an in vivo rodent fibroadenoma model.
Wirtzfeld LA; Nam K; Labyed Y; Ghoshal G; Haak A; Sen-Gupta E; He Z; Hirtz NR; Miller RJ; Sarwate S; Simpson DG; Zagzebski JA; Bigelow TA; Oelze M; Hall TJ; O'Brien WD
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Jul; 60(7):1386-400. PubMed ID: 25004506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trade-offs in data acquisition and processing parameters for backscatter and scatterer size estimations.
Liu W; Zagzebski JA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010; 57(2):340-52. PubMed ID: 20178900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Theoretical and phantom based investigation of the impact of sound speed and backscatter variations on attenuation slope estimation.
Omari E; Lee H; Varghese T
Ultrasonics; 2011 Aug; 51(6):758-67. PubMed ID: 21477832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interlaboratory comparison of backscatter coefficient estimates for tissue-mimicking phantoms.
Anderson JJ; Herd MT; King MR; Haak A; Hafez ZT; Song J; Oelze ML; Madsen EL; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
Ultrason Imaging; 2010 Jan; 32(1):48-64. PubMed ID: 20690431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Method for estimating total attenuation from a spatial map of attenuation slope for quantitative ultrasound imaging.
Pawlicki AD; O'Brien WD
Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Apr; 35(2):162-72. PubMed ID: 23493614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Scatterer number density considerations in reference phantom-based attenuation estimation.
Rubert N; Varghese T
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1680-96. PubMed ID: 24726800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Absolute backscatter coefficient estimates of tissue-mimicking phantoms in the 5-50 MHz frequency range.
McCormick MM; Madsen EL; Deaner ME; Varghese T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):737-43. PubMed ID: 21877789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimation of Backscatter Coefficients Using an In Situ Calibration Source.
Nguyen TN; Tam AJ; Do MN; Oelze ML
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2020 Feb; 67(2):308-317. PubMed ID: 31567079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attenuation and backscatter estimation using video signal analysis applied to B-mode images.
Knipp BS; Zagzebski JA; Wilson TA; Dong F; Madsen EL
Ultrason Imaging; 1997 Jul; 19(3):221-33. PubMed ID: 9447670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of differences in backscatter coefficients among four ultrasound scanners with different beamforming methods.
Omura M; Hasegawa H; Nagaoka R; Yoshida K; Yamaguchi T
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2020 Jan; 47(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 31679096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A method for estimating an overlying layer correction in quantitative ultrasound imaging.
Lu ZF; Zagzebski JA; Madsen EL; Dong F
Ultrason Imaging; 1995 Oct; 17(4):269-90. PubMed ID: 8677562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acoustic Properties of Breast Fat.
Nasief HG; Rosado-Mendez IM; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):2007-16. PubMed ID: 26446820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vivo breast tissue backscatter measurements with 7.5- and 10-MHz transducers.
Anderson ME; Soo MS; Trahey GE
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2001 Jan; 27(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 11295273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Phantom-Based Assessment of Repeatability and Reproducibility of Transvaginal Quantitative Ultrasound.
Chen S; McFarlin BL; Meagher BT; Peters TA; Simpson DG; O'Brien WD; Han A
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2019 Sep; 66(9):1413-1421. PubMed ID: 31217100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Signal to noise ratio comparisons for ultrasound attenuation slope estimation algorithms.
Omari EA; Varghese T
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):032902. PubMed ID: 24593741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
