133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23161350)
1. Interobserver reliability of fetal heart rate pattern interpretation using NICHD definitions.
Epstein AJ; Twogood S; Lee RH; Opper N; Beavis A; Miller DA
Am J Perinatol; 2013 Jun; 30(6):463-8. PubMed ID: 23161350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the NICHD 3-Tier Fetal Heart Rate Interpretation System.
Blackwell SC; Grobman WA; Antoniewicz L; Hutchinson M; Gyamfi Bannerman C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 205(4):378.e1-5. PubMed ID: 21864826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of visual analyses of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings according to the new national institute of child health and human development guidelines with computer analyses by an automated fetal heart rate monitoring system.
Devoe L; Golde S; Kilman Y; Morton D; Shea K; Waller J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Aug; 183(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 10942470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of fetal heart-rate variability interpretation by obstetricians using the criteria of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development compared with computer-aided interpretation.
Tongsong T; Iamthongin A; Wanapirak C; Piyamongkol W; Sirichotiyakul S; Boonyanurak P; Tatiyapornkul T; Neelasri C
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Feb; 31(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 15669996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of a novel computerized analysis program and visual interpretation of cardiotocography.
Chen CY; Yu C; Chang CC; Lin CW
PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e112296. PubMed ID: 25437442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A review of the 2008 NICHD Research Planning Workshop: recommendations for fetal heart rate terminology and interpretation.
Hankins GD; Miller DA
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 54(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 21278495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interobserver agreement in CTG interpretation using the 2015 FIGO guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring.
Rei M; Tavares S; Pinto P; Machado AP; Monteiro S; Costa A; Costa-Santos C; Bernardes J; Ayres-De-Campos D
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():27-31. PubMed ID: 27566218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interobserver reliability to interpret intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: Does a standardized algorithm improve agreement among clinicians?
Uccella S; Cromi A; Colombo GF; Bogani G; Casarin J; Agosti M; Ghezzi F
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Apr; 35(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 25254299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interobserver variation in the assessment of fetal heart rate recordings.
Donker DK; van Geijn HP; Hasman A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1993 Nov; 52(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 8119470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inter-observer reliability of 4 fetal heart rate classifications.
Garabedian C; Butruille L; Drumez E; Servan Schreiber E; Bartolo S; Bleu G; Mesdag V; Deruelle P; De Jonckheere J; Houfflin-Debarge V
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 46(2):131-135. PubMed ID: 28403968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intrapartum nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing and prediction of adverse outcomes: interobserver variability.
Chauhan SP; Klauser CK; Woodring TC; Sanderson M; Magann EF; Morrison JC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Dec; 199(6):623.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18667185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fetal heart rate baselines in twins. Interobserver agreement in antepartum estimation.
Bernardes J; Costa-Pereira A; Calejo L; Ayres-de-Campos D; PatrÃcio B; Pereira-Leite L
J Reprod Med; 2000 Feb; 45(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 10710739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Documentation improvements following multidisciplinary educational program on electronic fetal heart rate tracings.
Vadnais MA; Golen TH
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 May; 24(5):741-4. PubMed ID: 21067288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Midwives' visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocographs: intra- and inter-observer agreement.
Devane D; Lalor J
J Adv Nurs; 2005 Oct; 52(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 16164474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and evaluation of an algorithm for computer analysis of maternal heart rate during labor.
Pinto P; Bernardes J; Costa-Santos C; Amorim-Costa C; Silva M; Ayres-de-Campos D
Comput Biol Med; 2014 Jun; 49():30-5. PubMed ID: 24727565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intrapartum fetal heart rate definitions and interpretation: evolving consensus.
Miller DA
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 54(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 21278497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracing by physician and computer.
Bracero LA; Roshanfekr D; Byrne DW
J Matern Fetal Med; 2000; 9(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 10914628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Linear and nonlinear analysis of heart rate patterns associated with fetal behavioral states in the antepartum period.
Gonçalves H; Bernardes J; Rocha AP; Ayres-de-Campos D
Early Hum Dev; 2007 Sep; 83(9):585-91. PubMed ID: 17261357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of chronic maternal methadone therapy on intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns.
Ramirez-Cacho WA; Flores S; Schrader RM; McKay J; Rayburn WF
J Soc Gynecol Investig; 2006 Feb; 13(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 16443503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ST-segment analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram improves fetal heart rate tracing interpretation and clinical decision making.
Ross MG; Devoe LD; Rosen KG
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Mar; 15(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 15280144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
