These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. How to Approach Intrapartum Category II Tracings. Timmins AE; Clark SL Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2015 Jun; 42(2):363-75. PubMed ID: 26002172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Fetal heart rate during labour: definitions and interpretation]. Martin A J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Feb; 37 Suppl 1():S34-45. PubMed ID: 18191915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Changes in fetal heart rate and uterine patterns associated with uterine rupture. Sheiner E; Levy A; Ofir K; Hadar A; Shoham-Vardi I; Hallak M; Katz M; Mazor M J Reprod Med; 2004 May; 49(5):373-8. PubMed ID: 15214711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Fetal acidemia and electronic fetal heart rate patterns: is there evidence of an association? Parer JT; King T; Flanders S; Fox M; Kilpatrick SJ J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 May; 19(5):289-94. PubMed ID: 16753769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Visual analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings: inter- and intra-observer agreement and impact of knowledge of neonatal outcome. Figueras F; Albela S; Bonino S; Palacio M; Barrau E; Hernandez S; Casellas C; Coll O; Cararach V J Perinat Med; 2005; 33(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 15914348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Interobserver agreement in the assessment of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography in singleton pregnancies. Ojala K; Mäkikallio K; Haapsamo M; Ijäs H; Tekay A Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(5):536-40. PubMed ID: 18446537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Agreement of three interpretation systems of intrapartum foetal heart rate monitoring by different levels of physicians. Pruksanusak N; Thongphanang P; Chainarong N; Suntharasaj T; Kor-Anantakul O; Suwanrath C; Petpichetchian C J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Nov; 37(8):996-999. PubMed ID: 28599582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Measurement of fetal heart rate variability on an electronic monitor using a prototype electronic ruler. Hall LM; Hannon DJ; Leisk GG; Wolfberg AJ; House MD Am J Perinatol; 2012 Jun; 29(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 22399221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The clinical interpretation and significance of electronic fetal heart rate patterns 2 h before delivery: an institutional observational study. Maso G; Businelli C; Piccoli M; Montico M; De Seta F; Sartore A; Alberico S Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Nov; 286(5):1153-9. PubMed ID: 22791414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Pre-partum cardiotocography: comparison between the traditional and the computed systems]. Soncini E; Grignaffini A; Vadora E Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense; 2000; 71 Suppl 1():337-43. PubMed ID: 11424766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of fetal heart rate baseline estimation by SisPorto 2.01 and a consensus of clinicians. Ayres-de-Campos D; Bernardes J Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Dec; 117(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 15541853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The effect of chart speed on fetal monitor interpretation. Peleg D; Ram R; Warsof SL; Wolf MF; Larion S; Beydoun HA; Trochakerian S; Ben Shachar I J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(10):1577-80. PubMed ID: 26100761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Predictive value of late decelerations for fetal acidemia in unselective low-risk pregnancies. Sameshima H; Ikenoue T Am J Perinatol; 2005 Jan; 22(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 15668840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]