These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23161350)

  • 41. The development and validation of an algorithm for real-time computerised fetal heart rate monitoring in labour.
    Taylor GM; Mires GJ; Abel EW; Tsantis S; Farrell T; Chien PF; Liu Y
    BJOG; 2000 Sep; 107(9):1130-7. PubMed ID: 11002957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Intrapartum cardiotocogram monitoring between obstetricians and computer analysis.
    Magawa S; Tanaka H; Furuhashi F; Maki S; Nii M; Toriyabe K; Kondo E; Ikeda T
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Mar; 34(5):787-793. PubMed ID: 31072186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The fetal admission test and intrapartum fetal death.
    Golditch BD; Ahn MO; Phelan JP
    Am J Perinatol; 1998 Apr; 15(4):273-6. PubMed ID: 9565228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Misidentification of maternal heart rate as fetal on cardiotocography during the second stage of labor: the role of the fetal electrocardiograph.
    Nurani R; Chandraharan E; Lowe V; Ugwumadu A; Arulkumaran S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Dec; 91(12):1428-32. PubMed ID: 22881463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Frequency of fetal heart rate categories and short-term neonatal outcome.
    Jackson M; Holmgren CM; Esplin MS; Henry E; Varner MW
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 118(4):803-8. PubMed ID: 21897312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The effect of perceptual decision-making on the interpretation of twin fetal heart rate tracings.
    Ploran EJ; Soni S; Snellings JT; Rausch A; Rochelson B
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Jun; 35(11):2116-2121. PubMed ID: 32594812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Assessment of the concordance among 2-tier, 3-tier, and 5-tier fetal heart rate classification systems.
    Gyamfi Bannerman C; Grobman WA; Antoniewicz L; Hutchinson M; Blackwell S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Sep; 205(3):288.e1-4. PubMed ID: 22071068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Reliability in cardiotocography interpretation - impact of extended on-site education in addition to web-based learning: an observational study.
    Gyllencreutz E; Hulthén Varli I; Lindqvist PG; Holzmann M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Apr; 96(4):496-502. PubMed ID: 28052320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Computerized fetal heart rate analysis in labor: detection of intervals with un-assignable baseline.
    Georgieva A; Payne SJ; Moulden M; Redman CW
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Oct; 32(10):1549-60. PubMed ID: 21862845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Is continuous monitoring the answer to incidentally observed fetal heart rate decelerations?
    Sisco KM; Cahill AG; Stamilio DM; Macones GA
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2009 May; 22(5):405-9. PubMed ID: 19529997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Can the reproducibility of fetal heart rate baseline estimation be improved?
    Ayres-de-Campos D; Bernardes J; Marsal K; Nickelsen C; Makarainen L; Banfield P; Xavier P; Campos I
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Jan; 112(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 14687738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Basic principles of the foetal heart rate during delivery without hypoxia and acidosis.
    Roemer VM; Walden R
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2012 Feb; 216(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 22331523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Fetal heart rate pattern recognition by the method of auscultation.
    Miller FC; Pearse KE; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Sep; 64(3):332-6. PubMed ID: 6462562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Observation on validity of the five-tier system for fetal heart rate pattern interpretation proposed by Japan Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
    Sadaka A; Furuhashi M; Minami H; Miyazaki K; Yoshida K; Ishikawa K
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Dec; 24(12):1465-9. PubMed ID: 21923306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Relationship of early intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns to subsequent patterns and fetal outcome.
    Sarno AP; Phelan JP; Ahn MO
    J Reprod Med; 1990 Mar; 35(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 2325035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development report on fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Parer JT; Ikeda T; King TL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jul; 114(1):136-138. PubMed ID: 19546770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison of short term variability indexes in cardiotocographic foetal monitoring.
    Cesarelli M; Romano M; Bifulco P
    Comput Biol Med; 2009 Feb; 39(2):106-18. PubMed ID: 19193367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [The influence of observer-dependent properties upon the evaluation of fetal heart rate recordings (author's transl)].
    Richter R
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1981 Jan; 41(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 7202992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. How to read fetal heart rate tracings in labor: a comparison between ACOG and NICE guidelines.
    Buscicchio G; Gentilucci L; Martorana R; Martino C; Tranquilli AL
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Dec; 25(12):2797-8. PubMed ID: 22881995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Does the paper speed in fetal heart monitoring during labour influence the variability in the interpretation by professionals?].
    Lemoine H; Ehlinger V; Groussolles M; Arnaud C; Vayssière C
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Oct; 45(8):827-834. PubMed ID: 27496571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.