These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23161350)

  • 61. Comparison of the effects of meperidine and nalbuphine on intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings.
    Giannina G; Guzman ER; Lai YL; Lake MF; Cernadas M; Vintzileos AM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Sep; 86(3):441-5. PubMed ID: 7651658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Electronic fetal monitoring: what's reassuring?
    Berkus MD; Langer O; Samueloff A; Xenakis EM; Field NT
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Jan; 78(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 9926886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Conventional and computerized antepartum telecardiotocography. Experienced and inexperienced observers versus computerized analysis.
    Di Lieto A; Giani U; Campanile M; De Falco M; Scaramellino M; Papa R
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2003; 55(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 12624550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. [Predictive value of umbilical artery lactate levels and fetal heart rate monitoring for fetal distress].
    Zhang H; Zhang J; Wu W; Deng H
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Nov; 37(11):666-8. PubMed ID: 12487921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate changes after antepartum external cephalic version.
    Weiner Z; Farmakides G; Hsieh H; Maulik D
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Sep; 41(9):680-4. PubMed ID: 8887194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Comparison of five classification systems for interpreting electronic fetal monitoring in predicting neonatal status at birth.
    Di Tommaso M; Seravalli V; Cordisco A; Consorti G; Mecacci F; Rizzello F
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Mar; 26(5):487-90. PubMed ID: 23039108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Agreement and accuracy using the FIGO, ACOG and NICE cardiotocography interpretation guidelines.
    Santo S; Ayres-de-Campos D; Costa-Santos C; Schnettler W; Ugwumadu A; Da Graça LM;
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Feb; 96(2):166-175. PubMed ID: 27869985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. A comparison between visual and computer analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings.
    Gagnon R; Campbell MK; Hunse C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Mar; 168(3 Pt 1):842-7. PubMed ID: 8456890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines.
    Macones GA; Hankins GD; Spong CY; Hauth J; Moore T
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2008; 37(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 18761565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Visual interpretation of the effect of maternal betamethasone administration on the fetal heart rate pattern.
    van Iddekinge B; Hofmeyr GJ; Buchmann E
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2003 Jul; 23(4):360-3. PubMed ID: 12881071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Web-based comparison of historical vs contemporary methods of fetal heart rate interpretation.
    Epstein AJ; Iriye BK; Hancock L; Quilligan EJ; Rumney PJ; Hancock J; Ghamsary M; Eakin CM; Smith C; Wing DA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):488.e1-5. PubMed ID: 27094965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. [Pre-pathologic-pathologic cardiotocographic pattern in second stage of labor. Analysis of the incidence of acidosis and recommendations for fetal blood gas analysis].
    Schlotter CM
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1997; 119(3):117-22. PubMed ID: 9173769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Fetal pulse oximetry: correlation with intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns and neonatal outcome.
    Tekin A; Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Ozeren S; Corakçi A; Yücesoy I
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2008 Oct; 34(5):824-31. PubMed ID: 18834341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. [The clinical significance of accelerations in intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring (author's transl)].
    Richter R; Hohl M; Lüscher KP; Stucki D
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1980 Jun; 184(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 7467624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Comparison of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings in patients with neonatal seizures vs. no seizures: what are the differences?
    Williams KP; Galerneau F
    J Perinat Med; 2004; 32(5):422-5. PubMed ID: 15493719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. [Intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns and fetal outcome: prediction of newborn depression (author's transl)].
    Richter R; Hohl M; Lüscher KP; Stucki D
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1979 Aug; 183(4):264-71. PubMed ID: 539019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. [A new approach to quantitative electronic foetal heart-rate analysis].
    Roemer VM; Walden R
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2010 Jan; 214(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 20155661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Interpretation of low kappa values.
    Donker DK; Hasman A; van Geijn HP
    Int J Biomed Comput; 1993 Jul; 33(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 8349359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Predicting survival of periviable fetuses using NICHD fetal heart rate categories.
    Hale TM; Arul M; Veerappan A; Nguyen J; Velastegui Z; Shiffman R; Rajegowda B; Skupski D; Mercado R
    J Perinat Med; 2011 Jan; 39(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 20979447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.