153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23161517)
1. Incorporating network structure in integrative analysis of cancer prognosis data.
Liu J; Huang J; Ma S
Genet Epidemiol; 2013 Feb; 37(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 23161517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Integrative analysis of high-throughput cancer studies with contrasted penalization.
Shi X; Liu J; Huang J; Zhou Y; Shia B; Ma S
Genet Epidemiol; 2014 Feb; 38(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 24395534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Integrative Analysis of Cancer Diagnosis Studies with Composite Penalization.
Liu J; Huang J; Ma S
Scand Stat Theory Appl; 2014 Mar; 41(1):87-103. PubMed ID: 24578589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sparse group penalized integrative analysis of multiple cancer prognosis datasets.
Liu J; Huang J; Xie Y; Ma S
Genet Res (Camb); 2013 Jun; 95(2-3):68-77. PubMed ID: 23938111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Identification of Breast Cancer Prognosis Markers via Integrative Analysis.
Ma S; Dai Y; Huang J; Xie Y
Comput Stat Data Anal; 2012 Sep; 56(9):2718-2728. PubMed ID: 22773869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Promoting Similarity of Sparsity Structures in Integrative Analysis with Penalization.
Huang Y; Zhang Q; Zhang S; Huang J; Ma S
J Am Stat Assoc; 2017; 112(517):342-350. PubMed ID: 30100648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Promoting similarity of model sparsity structures in integrative analysis of cancer genetic data.
Huang Y; Liu J; Yi H; Shia BC; Ma S
Stat Med; 2017 Feb; 36(3):509-559. PubMed ID: 27667129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integrative analysis of prognosis data on multiple cancer subtypes.
Liu J; Huang J; Zhang Y; Lan Q; Rothman N; Zheng T; Ma S
Biometrics; 2014 Sep; 70(3):480-8. PubMed ID: 24766212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identification of breast cancer prognosis markers using integrative sparse boosting.
Ma S; Huang J; Xie Y; Yi N
Methods Inf Med; 2012; 51(2):152-61. PubMed ID: 22344268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gene network-based cancer prognosis analysis with sparse boosting.
Ma S; Huang Y; Huang J; Fang K
Genet Res (Camb); 2012 Aug; 94(4):205-21. PubMed ID: 22950901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identification of gene-environment interactions in cancer studies using penalization.
Liu J; Huang J; Zhang Y; Lan Q; Rothman N; Zheng T; Ma S
Genomics; 2013 Oct; 102(4):189-94. PubMed ID: 23994599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Incorporating gene co-expression network in identification of cancer prognosis markers.
Ma S; Shi M; Li Y; Yi D; Shia BC
BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 May; 11():271. PubMed ID: 20487548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Integrative analysis of multiple cancer prognosis studies with gene expression measurements.
Ma S; Huang J; Wei F; Xie Y; Fang K
Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(28):3361-71. PubMed ID: 22105693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robust network-based regularization and variable selection for high-dimensional genomic data in cancer prognosis.
Ren J; Du Y; Li S; Ma S; Jiang Y; Wu C
Genet Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 43(3):276-291. PubMed ID: 30746793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Integrative sparse partial least squares.
Liang W; Ma S; Zhang Q; Zhu T
Stat Med; 2021 Apr; 40(9):2239-2256. PubMed ID: 33559203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Integrative prescreening in analysis of multiple cancer genomic studies.
Song R; Huang J; Ma S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jul; 13():168. PubMed ID: 22799431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Integrative analysis of cancer prognosis data with multiple subtypes using regularized gradient descent.
Ma S; Zhang Y; Huang J; Huang Y; Lan Q; Rothman N; Zheng T
Genet Epidemiol; 2012 Dec; 36(8):829-38. PubMed ID: 22851516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An integrative sparse boosting analysis of cancer genomic commonality and difference.
Sun Y; Sun Z; Jiang Y; Li Y; Ma S
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 May; 29(5):1325-1337. PubMed ID: 31282286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. BMRF-MI: integrative identification of protein interaction network by modeling the gene dependency.
Shi X; Wang X; Shajahan A; Hilakivi-Clarke L; Clarke R; Xuan J
BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):S10. PubMed ID: 26099273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Network-based drug sensitivity prediction.
Ahmed KT; Park S; Jiang Q; Yeu Y; Hwang T; Zhang W
BMC Med Genomics; 2020 Dec; 13(Suppl 11):193. PubMed ID: 33371891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
