These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
66. Identification and Susceptibility Testing From Shortly Incubated Cultures Accelerate Blood Culture Diagnostics at No Cost. Idelevich EA; Becker K Clin Infect Dis; 2016 Jan; 62(2):268-9. PubMed ID: 26394670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. Antimicrobial resistance and bacterial identification utilizing a microelectronic chip array. Westin L; Miller C; Vollmer D; Canter D; Radtkey R; Nerenberg M; O'Connell JP J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Mar; 39(3):1097-104. PubMed ID: 11230433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Advances of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification technology in molecular diagnostics. Fu X; Shi Y; Ma J; Zhang K; Wang G; Li G; Xiao L; Wang H Biotechniques; 2022 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 36309987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Implementing Electric Potential Difference as a New Practical Parameter for Rapid and Specific Measurement of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Antibiotics. Mobasheri N; Karimi M; Hamedi J Curr Microbiol; 2018 Oct; 75(10):1290-1298. PubMed ID: 29869678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. MTTE: an innovative strategy for the evaluation of targeted/exome enrichment efficiency. Klonowska K; Handschuh L; Swiercz A; Figlerowicz M; Kozlowski P Oncotarget; 2016 Oct; 7(41):67266-67276. PubMed ID: 27572310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Nanotube assisted microwave electroporation for single cell pathogen identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Gao J; Li H; Torab P; Mach KE; Craft DW; Thomas NJ; Puleo CM; Liao JC; Wang TH; Wong PK Nanomedicine; 2019 Apr; 17():246-253. PubMed ID: 30794964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Feasibility study demonstrating that enzymatic template generation and amplification can be employed as a novel method for molecular antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Sodowich BI; Zweitzig DR; Riccardello NM; O'Hara SM BMC Microbiol; 2013 Aug; 13():191. PubMed ID: 23941533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Editorial Commentary: Rapid Blood Culture Identification: The Value of a Randomized Trial. Caliendo AM Clin Infect Dis; 2015 Oct; 61(7):1081-3. PubMed ID: 26197845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. Reply to Idelevich and Beck. Banerjee R; Teng CB; Cunningham SA; Ihde S; Steckelberg JP; Moriarty JP; Shah ND; Mandrekar J; Patel R Clin Infect Dis; 2016 Jan; 62(2):269-70. PubMed ID: 26394668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. Digital Quantification of DNA Replication and Chromosome Segregation Enables Determination of Antimicrobial Susceptibility after only 15 Minutes of Antibiotic Exposure. Schoepp NG; Khorosheva EM; Schlappi TS; Curtis MS; Humphries RM; Hindler JA; Ismagilov RF Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2016 Aug; 55(33):9557-61. PubMed ID: 27357747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Effect of dilution on sedimentational separation of bacteria from blood. Anderson CM; Pitt WG Biotechnol Prog; 2020 Nov; 36(6):e3056. PubMed ID: 32715664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. High-resolution assessment of copy number variation. Dobrovic A Clin Chem; 2015 May; 61(5):684-5. PubMed ID: 25840991 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. An accurate multiplex antibiotic susceptibility test using a high-resolution CE-SSCP-based stuffer-free multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification system. Chung B; Shin GW; Choi W; Hwang HS; Oh MH; Jung GY Electrophoresis; 2013 Jan; 34(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 23161622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]