These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23161966)

  • 1. U.S. election. Old challenges, new faces await science community in 2013.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2012 Nov; 338(6109):874-5. PubMed ID: 23161966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. US science faces a squeeze.
    Monastersky R; Tollefson J; Wadman M; Samuel Reich E
    Nature; 2010 Nov; 468(7321):146-7. PubMed ID: 21068799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Obama seeks science boost.
    Deng B; Monastersky R; Morello L; Reardon S; Tollefson J
    Nature; 2015 Feb; 518(7537):13-5. PubMed ID: 25652973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bush and Congress set debate on priorities.
    Marris E; Brumfiel G; Wadman M; Odling-Smee L
    Nature; 2007 Feb; 445(7128):572-3. PubMed ID: 17287773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Obama budget backs basic science.
    Fang J; Hand E; Monastersky R; Tollefson J; Wadman M; Waldrop M
    Nature; 2010 Feb; 463(7281):594-5. PubMed ID: 20130620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Budget instructions.
    Goldston D
    Nature; 2009 Sep; 461(7260):25. PubMed ID: 19727178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High stakes for US science.
    Tollefson J; Ledford H
    Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7421):453-5. PubMed ID: 23099376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Power shift stymies US science budget.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7124):130-1. PubMed ID: 17215810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cuts loom for US science.
    Semeniuk I; Thompson H
    Nature; 2012 Jul; 487(7408):414-5. PubMed ID: 22836976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. US fiscal deal leaves science vulnerable.
    Ledford H
    Nature; 2013 Jan; 493(7430):13. PubMed ID: 23282345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A vote for science.
    Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7421):445. PubMed ID: 23099362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. U.S. Policy. Election stakes go beyond control of the Senate.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2014 Oct; 346(6208):408-9. PubMed ID: 25342779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Financial planning.
    Goldston D
    Nature; 2008 Aug; 454(7205):680. PubMed ID: 18685673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stand and deliver.
    Nature; 2010 Feb; 463(7281):587-8. PubMed ID: 20130608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A two-year plan for US science.
    Greenberg DS
    Nature; 2010 Oct; 467(7317):781-2. PubMed ID: 20944714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Science policy. Group raises hackles as well as funds.
    Lawler A
    Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5536):1747-9. PubMed ID: 11546847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Republican win sparks fears for science funds.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6912):113. PubMed ID: 12432355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. US science agencies face budget limbo.
    Reardon S
    Nature; 2016 Sep; 537(7619):149. PubMed ID: 27604930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Obama shoots for science increase.
    Semeniuk I; Wadman M; Young S; Hand E; Reich ES; Monastersky R
    Nature; 2012 Feb; 482(7385):283-5. PubMed ID: 22337024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Science agencies get fresh paymasters in Republican revamp.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7030):129. PubMed ID: 15758963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.