BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23162520)

  • 1. A repeated lie becomes a truth? The effect of intentional control and training on deception.
    Hu X; Chen H; Fu G
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():488. PubMed ID: 23162520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The self in conflict: the role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes.
    Johnson R; Henkell H; Simon E; Zhu J
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):469-82. PubMed ID: 17919934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Deception, intention and clinical practice.
    Colgrove N
    J Med Ethics; 2023 Jul; 49(7):510-512. PubMed ID: 36517228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Explicit Instructions Increase Cognitive Costs of Deception in Predictable Social Context.
    Falkiewicz M; Sarzyńska J; Babula J; Szatkowska I; Grabowska A; Nęcka E
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1863. PubMed ID: 26696929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differential effects of practice on the executive processes used for truthful and deceptive responses: an event-related brain potential study.
    Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):386-404. PubMed ID: 16099352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detecting spontaneous deception in the brain.
    Feng YJ; Hung SM; Hsieh PJ
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2022 Jul; 43(10):3257-3269. PubMed ID: 35344258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence of mnemonic ability selectively affecting truthful and deceptive response dynamics.
    Farrow TF; Hopwood MC; Parks RW; Hunter MD; Spence SA
    Am J Psychol; 2010; 123(4):447-53. PubMed ID: 21291161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lie-specific involvement of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in deception.
    Priori A; Mameli F; Cogiamanian F; Marceglia S; Tiriticco M; Mrakic-Sposta S; Ferrucci R; Zago S; Polezzi D; Sartori G
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Feb; 18(2):451-5. PubMed ID: 17584853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Learning to lie: effects of practice on the cognitive cost of lying.
    Van Bockstaele B; Verschuere B; Moens T; Suchotzki K; Debey E; Spruyt A
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():526. PubMed ID: 23226137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI.
    Langleben DD; Loughead JW; Bilker WB; Ruparel K; Childress AR; Busch SI; Gur RC
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2005 Dec; 26(4):262-72. PubMed ID: 16161128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying deceptive hazard evaluation: An event-related potentials investigation.
    Fu H; Qiu W; Ma H; Ma Q
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182892. PubMed ID: 28793344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Who did I lie to that day? Deception impairs memory in daily life.
    Li Y; Liu Z; Liu X
    Psychol Res; 2022 Sep; 86(6):1763-1773. PubMed ID: 34988638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When deception becomes easy: the effects of task switching and goal neglect on the truth proportion effect.
    Van Bockstaele B; Wilhelm C; Meijer E; Debey E; Verschuere B
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1666. PubMed ID: 26579047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stop in the name of lies: The cost of blocking the truth to deceive.
    Aïte A; Houdé O; Borst G
    Conscious Cogn; 2018 Oct; 65():141-151. PubMed ID: 30176515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The contribution of executive processes to deceptive responding.
    Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(7):878-901. PubMed ID: 14998703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The truth about cognitive impairment in functional motor symptoms: An experimental deception study with the Guilty Knowledge Task.
    Demartini B; Ferrucci R; Goeta D; Ruggiero F; D'Agostino A; Priori A; Gambini O
    J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Jun; 64():174-179. PubMed ID: 30940452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characteristics of alpha power event-related desynchronization in the discrimination of spontaneous deceptive responses.
    Kim S; Jung KH; Lee JH
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Aug; 85(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 22554580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The deceptive response: effects of response conflict and strategic monitoring on the late positive component and episodic memory-related brain activity.
    Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
    Biol Psychol; 2003 Nov; 64(3):217-53. PubMed ID: 14630405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sophisticated Deception in Junior Middle School Students: An ERP Study.
    Leng H; Wang Y; Li Q; Yang L; Sun Y
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2675. PubMed ID: 30687155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Electrocortical Signature of Successful and Unsuccessful Deception in a Face-to-Face Social Interaction.
    Wagner-Altendorf TA; van der Lugt AH; Banfield JF; Meyer C; Rohrbach C; Heldmann M; Münte TF
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2020; 14():277. PubMed ID: 32765242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.