These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23162592)

  • 21. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Trends, Characteristics, and Success Rates of Treatment for Severe Early Childhood Caries Under General Anesthesia: A Retrospective Study in Northwest China.
    Liu F; Yang K; Wang P; Wu T; Li J; Guo Q
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2021 Oct; 45(4):278-283. PubMed ID: 34534298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Schenkel AB; Veitz-Keenan A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Mar; 3(3):CD010526. PubMed ID: 30834516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Schenkel AB; Peltz I; Veitz-Keenan A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 10(10):CD010526. PubMed ID: 27780315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Survival Rates of Stainless Steel Crowns and Multi-Surface Composite Restorations Placed by Dental Students in a Pediatric Clinic.
    Zahdan BA; Szabo A; Gonzalez CD; Okunseri EM; Okunseri CE
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2018; 42(3):167-172. PubMed ID: 29698143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis.
    Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth.
    Hickel R; Kaaden C; Paschos E; Buerkle V; García-Godoy F; Manhart J
    Am J Dent; 2005 Jun; 18(3):198-211. PubMed ID: 16158813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Teaching of posterior resin-based composite restorations in Brazilian dental schools.
    Gordan VV; Mjör IA; Veiga Filho LC; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 2000; 31(10):735-40. PubMed ID: 11204001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Despite all--do we have an appropriate substitute for amalgam?].
    Levin L; Samorodnitzky-Naveh G; Coval M; Geiger SB
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2008 Apr; 25(2):23-6, 73. PubMed ID: 18780542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In vitro Comparative Evaluation of Various Restorative Materials used for restoring Class III Cavities in Deciduous Anterior Teeth: A Clinical Study.
    Priyank H; Verma A; Gupta K; Chaudhary E; Khandelwal D; Nihalani S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Dec; 17(12):1022-1026. PubMed ID: 27965491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Class I and Class II silver amalgam and resin composite posterior restorations: teaching approaches in Canadian faculties of dentistry.
    McComb D
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Jun; 71(6):405-6. PubMed ID: 15955263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Self-etching primer and resin-based restorative material: two-year clinical evaluation.
    Gordan VV; Mjör IA; Vazquez O; Watson RE; Wilson N
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2002; 14(5):296-302. PubMed ID: 12405585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Restorative service patterns in Australia: amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer restorations.
    Brennan DS; Spencer AJ
    Int Dent J; 2003 Dec; 53(6):455-63. PubMed ID: 14725373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical survey on type of restoration in deciduous teeth.
    Fukuyama T; Oda S; Yamashita H; Sekiguchi H; Yakushiji M
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2008 Feb; 49(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 18580051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The amalgam-free dental school.
    Roeters FJ; Opdam NJ; Loomans BA
    J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):371-7. PubMed ID: 15193785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Crown vs. composite for post-retained restorations: A randomized clinical trial.
    Skupien JA; Cenci MS; Opdam NJ; Kreulen CM; Huysmans MC; Pereira-Cenci T
    J Dent; 2016 May; 48():34-9. PubMed ID: 26976553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical comparison of various esthetic restorative options for coronal build-up of primary anterior teeth.
    Duhan H; Pandit IK; Srivastava N; Gugnani N; Gupta M; Kochhar GK
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2015; 12(6):574-80. PubMed ID: 26759595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Placement and replacement rates of amalgam and composite restorations on posterior teeth in a military population.
    Owen BD; Guevara PH; Greenwood W
    US Army Med Dep J; 2017; (2-17):88-94. PubMed ID: 28853125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Frequency of restoration replacement in posterior teeth for U.S. Navy and Marine Corps personnel.
    Laccabue M; Ahlf RL; Simecek JW
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 23802636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.