These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Long-term results of microsurgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis by unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression. Oertel MF; Ryang YM; Korinth MC; Gilsbach JM; Rohde V Neurosurgery; 2006 Dec; 59(6):1264-9; discussion 1269-70. PubMed ID: 17277689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective comparative study of 2 minimally invasive decompression procedures for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) versus muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD). Arai Y; Hirai T; Yoshii T; Sakai K; Kato T; Enomoto M; Matsumoto R; Yamada T; Kawabata S; Shinomiya K; Okawa A Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Feb; 39(4):332-40. PubMed ID: 24299721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy. Thomé C; Zevgaridis D; Leheta O; Bäzner H; Pöckler-Schöniger C; Wöhrle J; Schmiedek P J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Aug; 3(2):129-41. PubMed ID: 16370302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of unilateral and bilateral laminotomies for decompression of L4-L5 spinal stenosis. Hong SW; Choi KY; Ahn Y; Baek OK; Wang JC; Lee SH; Lee HY Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Feb; 36(3):E172-8. PubMed ID: 21192307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Objective assessment of reduced invasiveness in MED. Compared with conventional one-level laminotomy. Sasaoka R; Nakamura H; Konishi S; Nagayama R; Suzuki E; Terai H; Takaoka K Eur Spine J; 2006 May; 15(5):577-82. PubMed ID: 15926058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Bilateral "over the top" decompression through unilateral laminotomy for lumbar and thoracic spinal canal stenosis]. Banczerowski P; Lipóth L; Veres R Ideggyogy Sz; 2007 Nov; 60(11-12):467-73. PubMed ID: 18198793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bilateral interlaminar fenestration and unroofing for the decompression of nerve roots by using a unilateral approach in lumbar canal stenosis. Iwatsuki K; Yoshimine T; Aoki M Surg Neurol; 2007 Nov; 68(5):487-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17825382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term outcomes of two different decompressive techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis. Fu YS; Zeng BF; Xu JG Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(5):514-8. PubMed ID: 18317196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Lateral fenestration combined with spinal canal decompression through contralateral laminotomy for radiculopathy caused by lumbar canal stenosis and lumbar foraminal stenosis: a case report]. Sasaki M; Aoki M; Yoshimine T No Shinkei Geka; 2010 May; 38(5):477-83. PubMed ID: 20522920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis. Overdevest G; Vleggeert-Lankamp C; Jacobs W; Thomé C; Gunzburg R; Peul W Eur Spine J; 2015 Oct; 24(10):2244-63. PubMed ID: 26184719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiological Outcomes of Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With and Without Discectomy. Cho HS; Kim SH; Han JS; Kim BJ World Neurosurg; 2023 Jul; 175():e1307-e1314. PubMed ID: 37164207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical Outcomes of Uniportal and Biportal Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Pair-Matched Case-Control Study. Hua W; Liao Z; Chen C; Feng X; Ke W; Wang B; Li S; Wang K; Zeng X; Wu X; Zhang Y; Yang C World Neurosurg; 2022 May; 161():e134-e145. PubMed ID: 35093578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Microendoscopic decompression via unilateral approach for lumbar spinal stenosis]. Yang B; Chen R; Xie P; Liu B; Dong J; Rong L Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 25(10):1158-63. PubMed ID: 22069964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes after minimally invasive lumbar decompression: a biomechanical comparison of unilateral and bilateral laminotomies. Ho YH; Tu YK; Hsiao CK; Chang CH BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Aug; 16():208. PubMed ID: 26285817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Midterm outcome after microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: 4-year prospective study. Castro-Menéndez M; Bravo-Ricoy JA; Casal-Moro R; Hernández-Blanco M; Jorge-Barreiro FJ Neurosurgery; 2009 Jul; 65(1):100-10; discussion 110; quiz A12. PubMed ID: 19574831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis in younger age patients could lead to higher stresses in the remaining neural arch -- a finite element investigation. Ivanov A; Faizan A; Sairyo K; Ebraheim N; Biyani A; Goel VK Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2007 Feb; 50(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 17546538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of unilateral laminectomy with bilateral decompression and fusion surgery in the treatment of grade I lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Park JH; Hyun SJ; Roh SW; Rhim SC Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2012 Jul; 154(7):1205-12. PubMed ID: 22653494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]