These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23163788)

  • 1. Memory for found targets interferes with subsequent performance in multiple-target visual search.
    Cain MS; Mitroff SR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1398-408. PubMed ID: 23163788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attentional guidance by working memory overrides salience cues in visual search.
    Dowd EW; Mitroff SR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1786-96. PubMed ID: 23565744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A little bit of history repeating: Splitting up multiple-target visual searches decreases second-target miss errors.
    Cain MS; Biggs AT; Darling EF; Mitroff SR
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2014 Jun; 20(2):112-25. PubMed ID: 24708353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The contents of visual working memory reduce uncertainty during visual search.
    Cosman JD; Vecera SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):996-1002. PubMed ID: 21287315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Fröhlich effect and representational gravity in memory for auditory pitch.
    Hubbard TL; Ruppel SE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):1153-64. PubMed ID: 23317117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The time it takes to turn a memory into a template.
    Wilschut A; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    J Vis; 2013 Apr; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23603144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Opposite effects of capacity load and resolution load on distractor processing.
    Zhang W; Luck SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 25365573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Working-memory capacity predicts the executive control of visual search among distractors: the influences of sustained and selective attention.
    Poole BJ; Kane MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1430-54. PubMed ID: 19123118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The ultra-rare-item effect: visual search for exceedingly rare items is highly susceptible to error.
    Mitroff SR; Biggs AT
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Jan; 25(1):284-9. PubMed ID: 24270463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of working memory contents and perceptual load on distractor processing: When a response-related distractor is held in working memory.
    Koshino H
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jan; 172():19-25. PubMed ID: 27838400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distractor probability changes the shape of the attentional template.
    Geng JJ; DiQuattro NE; Helm J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1993-2007. PubMed ID: 28425732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the role of working memory in spatial contextual cueing.
    Travis SL; Mattingley JB; Dux PE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):208-19. PubMed ID: 22642237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual salience can co-exist with dilution during visual selection.
    Biggs AT; Gibson BS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 23937214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Colour and spatial cueing in low-prevalence visual search.
    Russell NC; Kunar MA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(7):1327-44. PubMed ID: 22493942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of load on the guidance of visual attention from working memory.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Huang S; Kong L; Wang S
    Vision Res; 2011 Dec; 51(23-24):2356-61. PubMed ID: 21964327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search.
    Houtkamp R; Roelfsema PR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):423-42. PubMed ID: 16634680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Targets Need Their Own Personal Space: Effects of Clutter on Multiple-Target Search Accuracy.
    Adamo SH; Cain MS; Mitroff SR
    Perception; 2015; 44(10):1203-14. PubMed ID: 26562889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Guidance of visual attention from working memory contents depends on stimulus attributes.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Kong L; Huang S; Yue Z; Wang S
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Dec; 486(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 20884328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integration of cognitive allocentric information in visuospatial short-term memory through the hippocampus.
    Carrozzo M; Koch G; Turriziani P; Caltagirone C; Carlesimo GA; Lacquaniti F
    Hippocampus; 2005; 15(8):1072-84. PubMed ID: 16161036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.