These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23163791)

  • 1. Optimal weighting of costs and probabilities in a risky motor decision-making task requires experience.
    Neyedli HF; Welsh TN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):638-45. PubMed ID: 23163791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. People are better at maximizing expected gain in a manual aiming task with rapidly changing probabilities than with rapidly changing payoffs.
    Neyedli HF; Welsh TN
    J Neurophysiol; 2014 Mar; 111(5):1016-26. PubMed ID: 24335221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A switching cost for motor planning.
    Orban de Xivry JJ; Lefèvre P
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Dec; 116(6):2857-2868. PubMed ID: 27655964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The preference of probability over negative values in action selection.
    Neyedli HF; Welsh TN
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(2):261-83. PubMed ID: 25004846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experience and net worth affects optimality in a motor decision task.
    Neyedli HF; Welsh TN
    Motor Control; 2015 Jan; 19(1):75-89. PubMed ID: 25029662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Role of Consistent Context in Rapid Movement Planning: Suboptimal Endpoint Adjustment to Changing Rewards.
    Neyedli HF; LeBlanc KA
    J Mot Behav; 2017; 49(6):697-707. PubMed ID: 28481692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of visual error and reward feedback in learning to aim to an optimal movement endpoint.
    LeBlanc KA; Sanderson CK; Neyedli HF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1001-1012. PubMed ID: 32551732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal compensation for changes in task-relevant movement variability.
    Trommershäuser J; Gepshtein S; Maloney LT; Landy MS; Banks MS
    J Neurosci; 2005 Aug; 25(31):7169-78. PubMed ID: 16079399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risky visuomotor choices during rapid reaching in childhood.
    Dekker TM; Nardini M
    Dev Sci; 2016 May; 19(3):427-39. PubMed ID: 26190343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Choices in a key press decision-making task are more optimal after gaining both aiming and reward experience.
    Manzone JX; Taravati S; Neyedli HF; Welsh TN
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Dec; 73(12):2197-2216. PubMed ID: 32567514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Executive functions, categorization of probabilities, and learning from feedback: what does really matter for decision making under explicit risk conditions?
    Schiebener J; Zamarian L; Delazer M; Brand M
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2011 Nov; 33(9):1025-39. PubMed ID: 22082084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Healthy aging is associated with decreased risk-taking in motor decision-making.
    Valsecchi M; Billino J; Gegenfurtner KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jan; 44(1):154-167. PubMed ID: 28504524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reward-based learning of a redundant task.
    Tamagnone I; Casadio M; Sanguineti V
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2013 Jun; 2013():6650386. PubMed ID: 24187205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Altering movement parameters disrupts metacognitive accuracy.
    Palser ER; Fotopoulou A; Kilner JM
    Conscious Cogn; 2018 Jan; 57():33-40. PubMed ID: 29169032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impaired strategic decision making in schizophrenia.
    Kim H; Lee D; Shin YM; Chey J
    Brain Res; 2007 Nov; 1180():90-100. PubMed ID: 17905200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does the feedback from previous trials influence current decisions? A study on the role of feedback processing in making decisions under explicit risk conditions.
    Brand M
    J Neuropsychol; 2008 Sep; 2(2):431-43. PubMed ID: 19824172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identifying optimum performance trade-offs using a cognitively bounded rational analysis model of discretionary task interleaving.
    Janssen CP; Brumby DP; Dowell J; Chater N; Howes A
    Top Cogn Sci; 2011 Jan; 3(1):123-39. PubMed ID: 25164177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extended practice of reciprocal wrist and arm movements of varying difficulties.
    Boyle J; Panzer S; Wright D; Shea CH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jun; 140(2):142-53. PubMed ID: 22627158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Different neural adjustments improve endpoint accuracy with practice in young and old adults.
    Christou EA; Poston B; Enoka JA; Enoka RM
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 May; 97(5):3340-50. PubMed ID: 17376846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining movement kinematics, efficiency functions, and Brinley plots to study age-related slowing of sensorimotor processes: insights from Fitts' task.
    Rey-Robert B; Temprado JJ; Lemaire P; Berton E
    Gerontology; 2012; 58(2):171-80. PubMed ID: 21778701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.