170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23164227)
1. Short communication: The effect of premilking with a teat cup-like device, in a novel robotic rotary, on attachment accuracy and milk removal.
Kolbach R; Kerrisk KL; Garcia SC
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):360-5. PubMed ID: 23164227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of cleaning duration and water temperature on oxytocin release and milk removal in an automatic milking system.
Dzidic A; Macuhova J; Bruckmaier RM
J Dairy Sci; 2004 Dec; 87(12):4163-9. PubMed ID: 15545378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Premilking teat preparation for Australian pasture-based cows milked by an automated milking system.
Davis KL; Fulkerson WJ; Garcia SC; Dickeson D; Barchia IM
J Dairy Sci; 2008 Jul; 91(7):2604-9. PubMed ID: 18565919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short-term application of prestimulation and increased automatic cluster remover threshold affect milking characteristics of grazing dairy cows in late lactation.
Edwards JP; Jago JG; Lopez-Villalobos N
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Mar; 96(3):1886-93. PubMed ID: 23332836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of automatic cluster remover settings on production, udder health, and milking duration.
Jago JG; Burke JL; Williamson JH
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Jun; 93(6):2541-9. PubMed ID: 20494162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Technical note: Effects of attachment of hind teats before cleaning and attachment of front teats on milking characteristics in automatic milking systems.
Besier J; Schüpbach-Regula G; Wellnitz O; Bruckmaier RM
J Dairy Sci; 2017 Apr; 100(4):3091-3095. PubMed ID: 28161171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of 2 different premilking stimulation regimens, with and without manual forestripping, on teat tissue condition and milking performance in Holstein dairy cows milked 3 times daily.
Wieland M; Virkler PD; Weld A; Melvin JM; Wettstein MR; Oswald MF; Geary CM; Watters RD; Lynch R; Nydam DV
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Oct; 103(10):9548-9560. PubMed ID: 32828498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A longitudinal prospective cohort study investigating the association of premilking stimulation and teat-end shape on milking characteristics and teat tissue condition in dairy cows.
Wieland M; Melvin JM; Nydam DV; Virkler PD
BMC Vet Res; 2019 Feb; 15(1):58. PubMed ID: 30755196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors affecting milk flow traits in dairy cows: results of a field study.
Sandrucci A; Tamburini A; Bava L; Zucali M
J Dairy Sci; 2007 Mar; 90(3):1159-67. PubMed ID: 17297090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of 2 different premilking stimulation regimens, with and without a latency period, on teat tissue condition and milking performance in Holstein dairy cows.
Singh A; Geary CM; Case KL; Juran I; Olszanski L; Sytch N; Womack SJ; Dahl M; Spellman ME; Wieland M
J Dairy Sci; 2024 Mar; 107(3):1719-1733. PubMed ID: 37769948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of manual forestripping on milking performance of Holstein dairy cows.
Wagner AM; Ruegg PL
J Dairy Sci; 2002 Apr; 85(4):804-9. PubMed ID: 12018426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of premilking udder preparation on Holstein cows milked 3 times daily.
Watters RD; Schuring N; Erb HN; Schukken YH; Galton DM
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Mar; 95(3):1170-6. PubMed ID: 22365201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Milking efficiency for grazing dairy cows can be improved by increasing automatic cluster remover thresholds without applying premilking stimulation.
Edwards JP; Jago JG; Lopez-Villalobos N
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jun; 96(6):3766-73. PubMed ID: 23567056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variation in distances among teats of Holstein cows: implications for automated milking.
Miller RH; Fulton LA; Erez B; Williams WF; Pearson RE
J Dairy Sci; 1995 Jul; 78(7):1456-62. PubMed ID: 7593838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Milking responses of cows given premilking stimulation at four lactational stages.
Zinn SA; Gorewit RC; Sagi R
J Dairy Sci; 1982 Apr; 65(4):668-71. PubMed ID: 7096732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Visual detection of technical success and effectiveness of teat cleaning in two automatic milking systems.
Hovinen M; Aisla AM; Pyörälä S
J Dairy Sci; 2005 Sep; 88(9):3354-62. PubMed ID: 16107426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of a latency period between pre-stimulation and teat cup attachment and periodic vacuum reduction on milking characteristics and teat condition in dairy cows.
Vetter A; van Dorland HA; Youssef M; Bruckmaier RM
J Dairy Res; 2014 Feb; 81(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 24433587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of manual and mechanical stimulation on oxytocin release and milking characteristics in Holstein cows milked 3 times daily.
Watters RD; Bruckmaier RM; Crawford HM; Schuring N; Schukken YH; Galton DM
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Mar; 98(3):1721-9. PubMed ID: 25582591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of an automatic postmilking teat dipping system on new intramammary infections and iodine in milk.
Galton DM
J Dairy Sci; 2004 Jan; 87(1):225-31. PubMed ID: 14765830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of bail activation sequence and feed availability on cow traffic and milk harvesting capacity in a robotic rotary dairy.
Kolbach R; Kerrisk KL; Garcia SC; Dhand NK
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Apr; 96(4):2137-2146. PubMed ID: 23415530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
