136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23164332)
21. Ultrasonic versus drills implant site preparation: a histologic analysis in bovine ribs.
Scarano A; Iezzi G; Perrotti V; Tetè S; Staiti G; Mortellaro C; Cappucci C
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 May; 25(3):814-7. PubMed ID: 24777015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of two ultrasonic cleaning units for deterioration of cutting edges and debris removal on dental burs.
Villaseñor A; Hill SD; Seale NS
Pediatr Dent; 1992; 14(5):326-30. PubMed ID: 1338932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Morphological characteristics of osteotomies using different piezosurgical devices. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation.
Bauer SE; Romanos GE
Implant Dent; 2014 Jun; 23(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 24819806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of Er:YAG laser and surgical drill for osteotomy in oral surgery: an experimental study.
Gabrić Pandurić D; Bago I; Katanec D; Zabkar J; Miletić I; Anić I
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 70(11):2515-21. PubMed ID: 23078821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparative study of the cutting efficiency and working life of carbide burs.
Di Cristofaro RG; Giner L; Mayoral JR
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):391-6. PubMed ID: 23387508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Piezoelectric osteotomies in craniofacial procedures: a series of 15 pediatric patients. Technical note.
Kramer FJ; Ludwig HC; Materna T; Gruber R; Merten HA; Schliephake H
J Neurosurg; 2006 Jan; 104(1 Suppl):68-71. PubMed ID: 16509486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cortical bone healing following laser osteotomy using 6.1 microm wavelength.
Payne JT; Peavy GM; Reinisch L; Van Sickle DC
Lasers Surg Med; 2001; 29(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 11500861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Is Ultrasonic Bone Scalpel Useful in Le Fort I Osteotomy?
Demirbas AE; Bilge S; Celebi S; Kütük N; Alkan A
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Jan; 78(1):141.e1-141.e10. PubMed ID: 31669455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Experimental Comparison of the Performance of Cutting Bone and Soft Tissue between Piezosurgery and Conventional Rotary Instruments.
Otake Y; Nakamura M; Henmi A; Takahashi T; Sasano Y
Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):17154. PubMed ID: 30464184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Intraosseous heat generation during sonic, ultrasonic and conventional osteotomy.
Rashad A; Sadr-Eshkevari P; Heiland M; Smeets R; Hanken H; Gröbe A; Assaf AT; Köhnke RH; Mehryar P; Riecke B; Wikner J
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 43(7):1072-7. PubMed ID: 26116310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Osteotomy and membrane elevation during the maxillary sinus augmentation procedure. A comparative study: piezoelectric device vs. conventional rotative instruments.
Barone A; Santini S; Marconcini S; Giacomelli L; Gherlone E; Covani U
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 May; 19(5):511-5. PubMed ID: 18371101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Efficacy of two methods for restorative materials' removal in primary teeth.
Bittar DG; Murakami C; Hesse D; Imparato JC; Mendes FM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Sep; 12(5):372-8. PubMed ID: 22269199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Morphology of bone particles after harvesting with 4 different devices.
Papadimitriou DE; Schmidt EC; Caton JG; Romanos GE
Implant Dent; 2013 Apr; 22(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 23344367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Use of the Er:YAG laser for improved plating in maxillofacial surgery: comparison of bone healing in laser and drill osteotomies.
Lewandrowski KU; Lorente C; Schomacker KT; Flotte TJ; Wilkes JW; Deutsch TF
Lasers Surg Med; 1996; 19(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 8836995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Piezoelectric bone surgery in otosclerosis.
Vercellotti T; Dellepiane M; Mora R; Salami A
Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 127(9):932-7. PubMed ID: 17712671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Practitioner experience with sonic osteotomy compared to bur and ultrasonic saw: a pilot in vitro study.
Rashad A; Sadr-Eshkevari P; Heiland M; Smeets R; Prochnow N; Hoffmann E; Maurer P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Feb; 44(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 25277806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Technological characteristics and clinical indications of piezoelectric bone surgery.
Vercellotti T
Minerva Stomatol; 2004 May; 53(5):207-14. PubMed ID: 15263877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Endoscopic monobloc advancement with ultrasonic osteotomy: a feasibility study.
Maercks RA; Taylor JA; Gordon CB
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 21(2):479-82. PubMed ID: 20216451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Tissue changes and tissue reactivity following osteotomy by a conventional rotary device, an ultrasonic unit, and an Er: YAG laser - A comparative study in humans.
Blagova B; Krastev D; Krastev N; Malinova L
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Dec; 125(5):101750. PubMed ID: 38142938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Ultrasonic chemical vapor deposition-coated tip versus high- and low-speed carbide burs for apicoectomy: time required for resection and scanning electron microscopy analysis of the root-end surfaces.
Bernardes RA; de Souza Junior JV; Duarte MA; de Moraes IG; Bramante CM
J Endod; 2009 Feb; 35(2):265-8. PubMed ID: 19166787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
