228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23164600)
1. Science denial: a guide for scientists.
Rosenau J
Trends Microbiol; 2012 Dec; 20(12):567-9. PubMed ID: 23164600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The motivations behind science denial.
McLintic A
N Z Med J; 2019 Oct; 132(1504):88-94. PubMed ID: 31647799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trends that will affect your future ... the denier movements critique evolution, climate change, and nonlocal consciousness.
Schwartz SA
Explore (NY); 2010; 6(3):135-42. PubMed ID: 20451147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. NASA faked the moon landing--therefore, (climate) science is a hoax: an anatomy of the motivated rejection of science.
Lewandowsky S; Oberauer K; Gignac GE
Psychol Sci; 2013 May; 24(5):622-33. PubMed ID: 23531484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The voice of science: let's agree to disagree.
Sarewitz D
Nature; 2011 Oct; 478(7367):7. PubMed ID: 21979007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Taking distrust of science seriously: To overcome public distrust in science, scientists need to stop pretending that there is a scientific consensus on controversial issues when there is not.
Kabat GC
EMBO Rep; 2017 Jul; 18(7):1052-1055. PubMed ID: 28559435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Encourage early-career scientists to shape policy.
Bethke N; Gellert P; Seybold J
Nature; 2018 Oct; 562(7727):344. PubMed ID: 30333584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Using systematic reviews to separate scientific from policy debate relevant to climate change.
Petticrew M; McCartney G
Am J Prev Med; 2011 May; 40(5):576-8. PubMed ID: 21496759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Examining the Effectiveness of Climate Change Frames in the Face of a Climate Change Denial Counter-Frame.
McCright AM; Charters M; Dentzman K; Dietz T
Top Cogn Sci; 2016 Jan; 8(1):76-97. PubMed ID: 26621098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Climate policy. IPCC lessons from Berlin.
Wible B
Science; 2014 Jul; 345(6192):34. PubMed ID: 24994637
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The responsibility of scientists, a European view.
Ernst RR
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2003 Sep; 42(37):4434-9. PubMed ID: 14520738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Scientific wagers: Wanna bet?
Giles J
Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6914):354-5. PubMed ID: 12459753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Mavericks versus team players: the trade-off between shared glory and making a personal contribution.
Charlton BG
Med Hypotheses; 2008 Aug; 71(2):165-7. PubMed ID: 18524494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How to succeed in science: a concise guide for young biomedical scientists. Part II: making discoveries.
Yewdell JW
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol; 2008 Jun; 9(6):491-4. PubMed ID: 18401347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Climate science, denial and the Declaration of Delhi.
Laking G; Woodward A; Metcalfe S; Macmillan A; Lindsay G; Santa Barbara J; Maclennan A; Thompson I; Wells S;
N Z Med J; 2009 Dec; 122(1307):84-93. PubMed ID: 20148048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Science and technology for the new millenium].
Novo-Coronado E
Invest Clin; 2001 Mar; 42(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 11294028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Help to shape policy with your science.
Rosen J
Nature; 2018 Aug; 560(7720):671-673. PubMed ID: 30154539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Why Frankenstein is a Stigma Among Scientists.
Nagy P; Wylie R; Eschrich J; Finn E
Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Aug; 24(4):1143-1159. PubMed ID: 28653167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breaking down the stereotypes of science by recruiting young scientists.
Schaefer J; Farber SA
PLoS Biol; 2004 Oct; 2(10):e279. PubMed ID: 15486571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Make climate-change assessments more relevant.
Hallegatte S; Mach KJ
Nature; 2016 Jun; 534(7609):613-5. PubMed ID: 27357778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
