These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Difference in scientists' discourse about scientific fraud and impropriety. John ID Aust Psychol; 1991 Jul; 26(2):120-2. PubMed ID: 16134264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Normative Orientations of Climate Scientists. Bray D; von Storch H Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Oct; 23(5):1351-1367. PubMed ID: 25381220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Future directions in air-quality science, policy, and education. Ginsburg EO; Cowling EB Environ Int; 2003 Jun; 29(2-3):125-35. PubMed ID: 12676200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. US election: Politicians should think like scientists. Holt R Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7417):493-4. PubMed ID: 23018947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. A shift in climate. Nature; 2015 Oct; 526(7573):293. PubMed ID: 26469003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Tensions Between Science and Intuition Across the Lifespan. Shtulman A; Harrington K Top Cogn Sci; 2016 Jan; 8(1):118-37. PubMed ID: 26612345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Europe. Decision looms on future of E.U. science advice. Kupferschmidt K Science; 2014 Aug; 345(6196):500. PubMed ID: 25082677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Qualitative science policy. Mitcham C Qual Health Res; 2007 Dec; 17(10):1434-41. PubMed ID: 18000082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Four stages of a scientific discipline; four types of scientist. Shneider AM Trends Biochem Sci; 2009 May; 34(5):217-23. PubMed ID: 19362484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Real-life stories of online harassment - and how scientists got through it. Gewin V Nature; 2018 Oct; 562(7727):449-450. PubMed ID: 30327520 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]