272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23164836)
1. Evaluation of total knee arthroplasty performed with and without computer navigation: a bilateral total knee arthroplasty study.
Johnson DR; Dennis DA; Kindsfater KA; Kim RH
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Mar; 28(3):455-8. PubMed ID: 23164836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accelerometer-Based and Computer-Assisted Navigation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Reduction in Mechanical Axis Outliers Does Not Lead to Improvement in Functional Outcomes or Quality of Life When Compared to Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Goh GS; Liow MHL; Tay DK; Lo NN; Yeo SJ; Tan MH
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):379-385. PubMed ID: 29054725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of radiographic alignment of imageless computer-assisted surgery vs conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty.
Barrett WP; Mason JB; Moskal JT; Dalury DF; Oliashirazi A; Fisher DA
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1273-1284.e1. PubMed ID: 21723703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences in measurement of lower limb alignment among different registration methods of navigation and radiographs in TKA using the OrthoPilot system.
Seo SS; Seo JH; Sohn MW; Kim YJ
Orthopedics; 2012 Oct; 35(10 Suppl):50-5. PubMed ID: 23026253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Total knee arthroplasty with use of computer-assisted navigation compared with conventional guiding systems in the same patient: radiographic results in Asian patients.
Huang TW; Hsu WH; Peng KT; Hsu RW; Weng YJ; Shen WJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Jul; 93(13):1197-202. PubMed ID: 21776572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Plain radiograph fails to reflect the alignment and advantages of navigation in total knee arthroplasty.
Choi WC; Lee S; An JH; Kim D; Seong SC; Lee MC
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Aug; 26(5):756-64. PubMed ID: 20875940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using mini midvastus or medial parapatellar approach technique: A prospective, randomized, international multicentre trial.
Feczko P; Engelmann L; Arts JJ; Campbell D
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jan; 17():19. PubMed ID: 26762175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty.
Tolk JJ; Koot HW; Janssen RP
J Knee Surg; 2012 Sep; 25(4):347-52. PubMed ID: 23150163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Effect of the surgical time and coronalmechanical alignment after total knee arthroplasty using computer navigation system, traditionalor 3D printing patient-specific instruments].
Li Y; Tian H; Geng X
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 98(27):2157-2161. PubMed ID: 30032517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty for patients with retained implants in the femur.
Lin SY; Chen CH; Huang PJ; Fu YC; Huang HT
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2014 Aug; 30(8):415-21. PubMed ID: 25002380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Postoperative radiologic outcome comparison between conventional and computer-assisted navigation total knee arthroplasty in extra-articular tibia vara.
Cho Y; Shin HK; Kim E; Park JH; Park SJ; Jang T; Jeong HJ
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2020; 28(1):2309499020905702. PubMed ID: 32114895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative Study of Pinless Navigation System versus Conventional Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Pawar P; Naik L; Sahu D; Bagaria V
Clin Orthop Surg; 2021 Sep; 13(3):358-365. PubMed ID: 34484629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accelerometer-based, portable navigation vs imageless, large-console computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of radiographic results.
Nam D; Weeks KD; Reinhardt KR; Nawabi DH; Cross MB; Mayman DJ
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Feb; 28(2):255-61. PubMed ID: 22704226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Midterm Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Computer-Assisted vs Minimally Invasive Jig-Based Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Hasegawa M; Miyazaki S; Yamaguchi T; Wakabayashi H; Sudo A
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jan; 32(1):43-46. PubMed ID: 27503697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of an accelerometer-based system for the tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty.
Iorio R; Mazza D; Drogo P; Bolle G; Conteduca F; Redler A; Valeo L; Conteduca J; Ferretti A
Int Orthop; 2015 Mar; 39(3):461-6. PubMed ID: 25300395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-assisted navigation of total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis in a patient with severe posttraumatic femoral deformity.
Kuo CC; Bosque J; Meehan JP; Jamali AA
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Sep; 26(6):976.e17-20. PubMed ID: 21856500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of computer-navigated and conventional total knee arthroplasty in patients with Ranawat type-II valgus deformity: medium-term clinical and radiological results.
Huang TW; Lee CY; Lin SJ; Peng KT; Huang KC; Lee MS; Hsu RW; Shen WJ
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Nov; 15():390. PubMed ID: 25416446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. No differences in mid- to long-term outcomes of computer-assisted navigation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty.
Lee DY; Park YJ; Hwang SC; Park JS; Kang DG
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2020 Oct; 28(10):3183-3192. PubMed ID: 31784782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measuring long radiographs affects the positioning of femoral components in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.
Stucinskas J; Robertsson O; Lebedev A; Wingstrand H; Smailys A; Tarasevicius S
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2016 May; 136(5):693-700. PubMed ID: 26971267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty: nonimage-based navigation system versus conventional technique.
Zhang XL; Zhang W; Shao JJ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Jan; 125(2):236-43. PubMed ID: 22340552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
