380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23165187)
1. Applying quantitative structure-activity relationship approaches to nanotoxicology: current status and future potential.
Winkler DA; Mombelli E; Pietroiusti A; Tran L; Worth A; Fadeel B; McCall MJ
Toxicology; 2013 Nov; 313(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 23165187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Substance-tailored testing strategies in toxicology: an in silico methodology based on QSAR modeling of toxicological thresholds and Monte Carlo simulations of toxicological testing.
Péry AR; Desmots S; Mombelli E
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Feb; 56(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 19766156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mapping the dawn of nanoecotoxicological research.
Kahru A; Ivask A
Acc Chem Res; 2013 Mar; 46(3):823-33. PubMed ID: 23148404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On the nature, evolution and future of quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) in toxicology.
Veith GD
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2004; 15(5-6):323-30. PubMed ID: 15669692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Literature Review of (Q)SAR Modelling of Nanomaterial Toxicity.
Oksel C; Ma CY; Liu JJ; Wilkins T; Wang XZ
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2017; 947():103-142. PubMed ID: 28168667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In silico toxicology for the pharmaceutical sciences.
Valerio LG
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2009 Dec; 241(3):356-70. PubMed ID: 19716836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chemical structure of mutagens and carcinogens and the relationship with biological activity.
Benigni R
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2004 Mar; 23(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 15149144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative study of predictive computational models for nanoparticle-induced cytotoxicity.
Sayes C; Ivanov I
Risk Anal; 2010 Nov; 30(11):1723-34. PubMed ID: 20561263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation criteria for the quality of published experimental data on nanomaterials and their usefulness for QSAR modelling.
Lubinski L; Urbaszek P; Gajewicz A; Cronin MT; Enoch SJ; Madden JC; Leszczynska D; Leszczynski J; Puzyn T
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2013; 24(12):995-1008. PubMed ID: 24313439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictive models for nanotoxicology: current challenges and future opportunities.
Clark KA; White RH; Silbergeld EK
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Apr; 59(3):361-3. PubMed ID: 21310205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Approach to using mechanism-based structure activity relationship (SAR) analysis to assess human health hazard potential of nanomaterials.
Lai DY
Food Chem Toxicol; 2015 Nov; 85():120-6. PubMed ID: 26111809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer-aided nanotoxicology: assessing cytotoxicity of nanoparticles under diverse experimental conditions by using a novel QSTR-perturbation approach.
Luan F; Kleandrova VV; González-Díaz H; Ruso JM; Melo A; Speck-Planche A; Cordeiro MN
Nanoscale; 2014 Sep; 6(18):10623-30. PubMed ID: 25083742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In silico-aided prediction of biological properties of chemicals: oestrogen receptor-mediated effects.
Roncaglioni A; Benfenati E
Chem Soc Rev; 2008 Mar; 37(3):441-50. PubMed ID: 18224255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative structure-based modeling applied to characterization and prediction of chemical toxicity.
Benigni R; Richard AM
Methods; 1998 Mar; 14(3):264-76. PubMed ID: 9571083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. From QSAR to QSIIR: searching for enhanced computational toxicology models.
Zhu H
Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 930():53-65. PubMed ID: 23086837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Advancing risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials: application of computational approaches.
Gajewicz A; Rasulev B; Dinadayalane TC; Urbaszek P; Puzyn T; Leszczynska D; Leszczynski J
Adv Drug Deliv Rev; 2012 Dec; 64(15):1663-93. PubMed ID: 22664229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In silico modelling of hazard endpoints: current problems and perspectives.
Mekenyan O; Dimitrov S; Schmieder P; Veith G
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2003; 14(5-6):361-71. PubMed ID: 14758980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computational toxicology as implemented by the U.S. EPA: providing high throughput decision support tools for screening and assessing chemical exposure, hazard and risk.
Kavlock R; Dix D
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):197-217. PubMed ID: 20574897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
