1038 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23165615)
1. Short-term outcomes after esophagectomy at 164 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hospitals: effect of operative approach and hospital-level variation.
Merkow RP; Bilimoria KY; McCarter MD; Phillips JD; DeCamp MM; Sherman KL; Ko CY; Bentrem DJ
Arch Surg; 2012 Nov; 147(11):1009-16. PubMed ID: 23165615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy at a single, high-volume centre.
Sihag S; Wright CD; Wain JC; Gaissert HA; Lanuti M; Allan JS; Mathisen DJ; Morse CR
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2012 Sep; 42(3):430-7. PubMed ID: 22345284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of operative approach for oesophageal cancer on outcome: the transhiatal approach may influence circumferential margin involvement.
Suttie SA; Nanthakumaran S; Mofidi R; Rapson T; Gilbert FJ; Thompson AM; Park KG
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Feb; 38(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 22154884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transhiatal versus transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a 2005-2011 NSQIP comparison of modern multicenter results.
Papenfuss WA; Kukar M; Attwood K; Kakarla VR; Chousleb S; Hochwald SN; Nurkin SJ
J Surg Oncol; 2014 Sep; 110(3):298-301. PubMed ID: 24891305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incidence and risk factors for respiratory complications in patients undergoing esophagectomy for malignancy: a NSQIP analysis.
Molena D; Mungo B; Stem M; Lidor AO
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014; 26(4):287-94. PubMed ID: 25837540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of perioperative outcomes after combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy and open Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.
Pham TH; Perry KA; Dolan JP; Schipper P; Sukumar M; Sheppard BC; Hunter JG
Am J Surg; 2010 May; 199(5):594-8. PubMed ID: 20466101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Xie MR; Liu CQ; Guo MF; Mei XY; Sun XH; Xu MQ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 May; 97(5):1721-7. PubMed ID: 24657031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association of perioperative fluid balance and adverse surgical outcomes in esophageal cancer and esophagogastric junction cancer.
Wei S; Tian J; Song X; Chen Y
Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Jul; 86(1):266-72. PubMed ID: 18573435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leaks after transhiatal esophagectomy: risk factors, presentation, and detection.
Cooke DT; Lin GC; Lau CL; Zhang L; Si MS; Lee J; Chang AC; Pickens A; Orringer MB
Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 88(1):177-84; discussion 184-5. PubMed ID: 19559221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical factors influence the outcome after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: a consecutive series of 240 patients at an experienced center.
Ott K; Bader FG; Lordick F; Feith M; Bartels H; Siewert JR
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):1017-25. PubMed ID: 19189186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes after transhiatal and transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer.
Chang AC; Ji H; Birkmeyer NJ; Orringer MB; Birkmeyer JD
Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Feb; 85(2):424-9. PubMed ID: 18222237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identification of specific quality improvement opportunities for the elderly undergoing gastrointestinal surgery.
Bentrem DJ; Cohen ME; Hynes DM; Ko CY; Bilimoria KY
Arch Surg; 2009 Nov; 144(11):1013-20. PubMed ID: 19917937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences in reported esophageal cancer resection outcomes between national clinical and administrative databases.
Lapar DJ; Stukenborg GJ; Lau CL; Jones DR; Kozower BD
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1152-7. PubMed ID: 22938777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hospital esophageal cancer resection volume does not predict patient mortality risk.
Kozower BD; Stukenborg GJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2012 May; 93(5):1690-6; discussion 1696-8. PubMed ID: 22541199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma: experience from a single tertiary care institution.
Kawoosa NU; Dar AM; Sharma ML; Ahangar AG; Lone GN; Bhat MA; Singh S
World J Surg; 2011 Jun; 35(6):1296-302. PubMed ID: 21384241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer.
Kondra J; Ong SR; Clifton J; Evans K; Finley RJ; Yee J
Dis Esophagus; 2008; 21(5):422-9. PubMed ID: 19125796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Curative effect comparison between Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy and left transthoracic esophagectomy in treatment of middle thoracic esophagus carcinoma.
Song L; Liu Y; Wang Z; Ren WG; Liu XY
Hepatogastroenterology; 2012 May; 59(115):738-41. PubMed ID: 22024231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Techniques and short-term outcomes for total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophageal resection in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers: pooled data from six European centers.
Straatman J; van der Wielen N; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; Rosman C; Roig J; Scheepers JJ; Cuesta MA; Luyer MD; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Workum F; Gisbertz SS; van der Peet DL
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jan; 31(1):119-126. PubMed ID: 27129563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Esophagectomies with thoracic incisions carry increased pulmonary morbidity.
Bhayani NH; Gupta A; Dunst CM; Kurian AA; Reavis KM; Swanström LL
JAMA Surg; 2013 Aug; 148(8):733-8. PubMed ID: 23784203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A decade analysis of trends and outcomes of partial versus total esophagectomy in the United States.
Jafari MD; Halabi WJ; Smith BR; Nguyen VQ; Phelan MJ; Stamos MJ; Nguyen NT
Ann Surg; 2013 Sep; 258(3):450-8. PubMed ID: 24022437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
