146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23166192)
1. The nose knows not: poor predictive value of stool sample odor for detection of Clostridium difficile.
Rao K; Berland D; Young C; Walk ST; Newton DW
Clin Infect Dis; 2013 Feb; 56(4):615-6. PubMed ID: 23166192
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of modified PCR ribotyping for direct detection of Clostridium difficile ribotypes in stool samples.
Janezic S; Strumbelj I; Rupnik M
J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Aug; 49(8):3024-5. PubMed ID: 21632902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rapid, accurate, and on-site detection of C. difficile in stool samples.
Bomers MK; Menke FP; Savage RS; Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM; van Agtmael MA; Covington JA; Smulders YM
Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Apr; 110(4):588-94. PubMed ID: 25823766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rapid detection of toxigenic strains of Clostridium difficile in diarrheal stools by real-time PCR.
Barbut F; Braun M; Burghoffer B; Lalande V; Eckert C
J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Apr; 47(4):1276-7. PubMed ID: 19244461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a new molecular test, the BD Max Cdiff, for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in fecal samples.
Le Guern R; Herwegh S; Grandbastien B; Courcol R; Wallet F
J Clin Microbiol; 2012 Sep; 50(9):3089-90. PubMed ID: 22760042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rapid and reliable diagnostic algorithm for detection of Clostridium difficile.
Fenner L; Widmer AF; Goy G; Rudin S; Frei R
J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Jan; 46(1):328-30. PubMed ID: 18032627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Bristol stool scale and its relationship to Clostridium difficile infection.
Caroff DA; Edelstein PH; Hamilton K; Pegues DA;
J Clin Microbiol; 2014 Sep; 52(9):3437-9. PubMed ID: 25031446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infections.
Lalande V; Barrault L; Wadel S; Eckert C; Petit JC; Barbut F
J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Jul; 49(7):2714-6. PubMed ID: 21525213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of changes in Clostridium difficile testing practices on stool rejection policies and C. difficile positivity rates across multiple laboratories in the United States.
Cohen J; Limbago B; Dumyati G; Holzbauer S; Johnston H; Perlmutter R; Dunn J; Nadle J; Lyons C; Phipps E; Beldavs Z; Clark LA; Lessa FC;
J Clin Microbiol; 2014 Feb; 52(2):632-4. PubMed ID: 24478500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rapid stool-based diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection by real-time PCR in a children's hospital.
Luna RA; Boyanton BL; Mehta S; Courtney EM; Webb CR; Revell PA; Versalovic J
J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Mar; 49(3):851-7. PubMed ID: 21209161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clostridium difficile infection in outpatients, Maryland and Connecticut, USA, 2002-2007.
Hirshon JM; Thompson AD; Limbago B; McDonald LC; Bonkosky M; Heimer R; Meek J; Mai V; Braden C
Emerg Infect Dis; 2011 Oct; 17(10):1946-9. PubMed ID: 22000379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a new commercial TaqMan PCR assay for direct detection of the clostridium difficile toxin B gene in clinical stool specimens.
Stamper PD; Babiker W; Alcabasa R; Aird D; Wehrlin J; Ikpeama I; Gluck L; Carroll KC
J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Dec; 47(12):3846-50. PubMed ID: 19846637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Glutamate dehydrogenase for laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.
Goldenberg SD; Cliff PR; French GL
J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Aug; 48(8):3050-1; author reply 3051. PubMed ID: 20668302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Algorithm combining toxin immunoassay and stool culture for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.
Shin BM; Kuak EY; Lee EJ; Songer JG
J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Sep; 47(9):2952-6. PubMed ID: 19625481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The diagnostic performance and accuracy of 3 molecular assays for the detection of Clostridium difficile in stool samples, compared with the Xpert® C. difficile assay.
Azrad M; Tkhawkho L; Hamo Z; Peretz A
J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Jan; 168():105784. PubMed ID: 31758952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Usefulness of the Bristol Stool Form Chart scoring system for the laboratory processing of faecal samples in suspected Clostridioides difficile cases.
Corrigan RA; Sithamparanathan K; Kenny C; Wong THN
J Hosp Infect; 2020 May; 105(1):95-97. PubMed ID: 31836551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of tcdB real-time PCR in a three-step diagnostic algorithm for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.
Larson AM; Fung AM; Fang FC
J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 48(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 19923482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnosis and Treatment of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile Infection in Adults in 2020.
Rao K; Malani PN
JAMA; 2020 Apr; 323(14):1403-1404. PubMed ID: 32150234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Pseudomembranes on colostomy.
Jawa P; Conlin F
Mayo Clin Proc; 2009 Mar; 84(3):214. PubMed ID: 19252106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification compared to real-time PCR and enzyme immunoassay for toxigenic Clostridium difficile detection.
Boyanton BL; Sural P; Loomis CR; Pesta C; Gonzalez-Krellwitz L; Robinson-Dunn B; Riska P
J Clin Microbiol; 2012 Mar; 50(3):640-5. PubMed ID: 22189114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
