146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23166192)
41. Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection can molecular amplification methods move us out of uncertainty?
Tenover FC; Baron EJ; Peterson LR; Persing DH
J Mol Diagn; 2011 Nov; 13(6):573-82. PubMed ID: 21854871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Clinical importance of Clostridium difficile finding in hospitalized patients].
Kocić B; Stojanović P
Med Pregl; 2008; 61(11-12):632-7. PubMed ID: 19368285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Clostridium difficile mixed infection and reinfection.
Eyre DW; Walker AS; Griffiths D; Wilcox MH; Wyllie DH; Dingle KE; Crook DW; Peto TE
J Clin Microbiol; 2012 Jan; 50(1):142-4. PubMed ID: 22075589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Optimal methods for identifying Clostridium difficile infections.
Gerding DN; Brazier JS
Clin Infect Dis; 1993 Jun; 16 Suppl 4():S439-42. PubMed ID: 8324164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Rapid detection assay of toxigenic Clostridioides difficile through PathOC RightGene, a novel high-speed polymerase chain reaction device.
Okanda T; Mitsutake H; Aso R; Sekizawa R; Takemura H; Matsumoto T; Nakamura S
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2021 Feb; 99(2):115247. PubMed ID: 33188946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Specific detection of toxigenic strains of Clostridium difficile in stool specimens.
Gumerlock PH; Tang YJ; Weiss JB; Silva J
J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Mar; 31(3):507-11. PubMed ID: 8458943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Rapid molecular characterization of Clostridium difficile and assessment of populations of C. difficile in stool specimens.
Wroblewski D; Hannett GE; Bopp DJ; Dumyati GK; Halse TA; Dumas NB; Musser KA
J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Jul; 47(7):2142-8. PubMed ID: 19403775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Using a dog's superior olfactory sensitivity to identify Clostridium difficile in stools and patients: proof of principle study.
Bomers MK; van Agtmael MA; Luik H; van Veen MC; Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM; Smulders YM
BMJ; 2012 Dec; 345():e7396. PubMed ID: 23241268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Novel one-step method for detection and isolation of active-toxin-producing Clostridium difficile strains directly from stool samples.
Darkoh C; Dupont HL; Kaplan HB
J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Dec; 49(12):4219-24. PubMed ID: 21976761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Stool transplants: ready for prime time?
Weissman JS; Coyle W
Curr Gastroenterol Rep; 2012 Aug; 14(4):313-6. PubMed ID: 22585070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Presumptive identification of Clostridium difficile strain 027/NAP1/BI on Cepheid Xpert: interpret with caution.
Kok J; Wang Q; Thomas LC; Gilbert GL
J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Oct; 49(10):3719-21. PubMed ID: 21849697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile--associated disease: patient selection and test perfection.
Gerding DN
Am J Med; 1996 May; 100(5):485-6. PubMed ID: 8644758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. A systematic evaluation of methods to optimize culture-based recovery of Clostridium difficile from stool specimens.
Hink T; Burnham CA; Dubberke ER
Anaerobe; 2013 Feb; 19():39-43. PubMed ID: 23247066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Epidemic Clostridium difficile ribotype 027 in Chile.
Hernández-Rocha C; Barra-Carrasco J; Pizarro-Guajardo M; Ibáñez P; Bueno SM; Sarker MR; Guzman AM; Alvarez-Lobos M; Paredes-Sabja D
Emerg Infect Dis; 2012 Aug; 18(8):1370-2. PubMed ID: 22840230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Challenges in the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.
Corsello PM; Micic D; Rao K; Waljee AK
Gastroenterology; 2014 Jun; 146(7):1820-2. PubMed ID: 24768590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Nonutility of repeat laboratory testing for detection of Clostridium difficile by use of PCR or enzyme immunoassay.
Aichinger E; Schleck CD; Harmsen WS; Nyre LM; Patel R
J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Nov; 46(11):3795-7. PubMed ID: 18784320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Clostridium difficile infection: emerging concepts and treatments.
Mathew T; Higginbottom PA
Curr Gastroenterol Rep; 2008 Aug; 10(4):404-8. PubMed ID: 18627654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.
Goldenberg SD; Cliff PR; French GL
J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Aug; 48(8):3048-9. PubMed ID: 20668301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Detection of C. difficile toxin as a model assay for performing fully automated high-throughput RT-PCR on clinical stool samples.
Eigner U; Nörz D; Reucher S; Furrer J; Sun J; Chu K; Kolb M; Hefner N; Pfefferle S; Lütgehetmann M
J Microbiol Methods; 2020 May; 172():105882. PubMed ID: 32119956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Impact of strain type on detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile: comparison of molecular diagnostic and enzyme immunoassay approaches.
Tenover FC; Novak-Weekley S; Woods CW; Peterson LR; Davis T; Schreckenberger P; Fang FC; Dascal A; Gerding DN; Nomura JH; Goering RV; Akerlund T; Weissfeld AS; Baron EJ; Wong E; Marlowe EM; Whitmore J; Persing DH
J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Oct; 48(10):3719-24. PubMed ID: 20702676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
