302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23166362)
1. Effect of voxel size on the accuracy of 3D reconstructions with cone beam CT.
Maret D; Telmon N; Peters OA; Lepage B; Treil J; Inglèse JM; Peyre A; Kahn JL; Sixou M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Dec; 41(8):649-55. PubMed ID: 23166362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the accuracy of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography and micro-computed tomography reconstructions by using different voxel sizes.
Maret D; Peters OA; Galibourg A; Dumoncel J; Esclassan R; Kahn JL; Sixou M; Telmon N
J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1321-6. PubMed ID: 25146011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of 3D reconstructions based on cone beam computed tomography.
Maret D; Molinier F; Braga J; Peters OA; Telmon N; Treil J; Inglèse JM; Cossié A; Kahn JL; Sixou M
J Dent Res; 2010 Dec; 89(12):1465-9. PubMed ID: 20929716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of automatic segmentation of teeth using a watershed-based method.
Galibourg A; Dumoncel J; Telmon N; Calvet A; Michetti J; Maret D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Jan; 47(1):20170220. PubMed ID: 28937285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of in vitro mandibular volumetric measurements from CBCT of different voxel sizes with different segmentation threshold settings.
Dong T; Xia L; Cai C; Yuan L; Ye N; Fang B
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Sep; 19(1):206. PubMed ID: 31484529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative evaluation of cone beam CT and micro-CT on trabecular bone structures in the human mandible.
Van Dessel J; Huang Y; Depypere M; Rubira-Bullen I; Maes F; Jacobs R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(8):20130145. PubMed ID: 23833320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of cone beam computed tomography as a tool to explore root canal anatomy.
Michetti J; Maret D; Mallet JP; Diemer F
J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1187-90. PubMed ID: 20630296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy Assessment of Three-dimensional Surface Reconstructions of In vivo Teeth from Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
Sang YH; Hu HC; Lu SH; Wu YW; Li WR; Tang ZH
Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Jun; 129(12):1464-70. PubMed ID: 27270544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy assessment of three-dimensional surface reconstructions of teeth from cone beam computed tomography scans.
Al-Rawi B; Hassan B; Vandenberge B; Jacobs R
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 May; 37(5):352-8. PubMed ID: 20180895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of CBCT parameters on the output of an automatic edge-detection-based endodontic segmentation.
Michetti J; Georgelin-Gurgel M; Mallet JP; Diemer F; Boulanouar K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(8):20140413. PubMed ID: 26119343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tooth and root size as determined from 0.25- and 0.30-mm voxel size cone-beam CT imaging when contrasted to micro-CT scans (0.06 mm): An ex vivo study.
Coutsiers Morell GF; Berlin-Broner Y; Flores-Mir C; Heo G
J Orthod; 2022 Jun; 49(2):174-178. PubMed ID: 34903069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of linear measurements and visibility of the mandibular canal of cone-beam computed tomography images with different voxel sizes: an in vitro study.
Waltrick KB; Nunes de Abreu Junior MJ; Corrêa M; Zastrow MD; Dutra VD
J Periodontol; 2013 Jan; 84(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 22390549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of volumetric measurement of teeth in vivo based on cone beam computer tomography.
Wang Y; He S; Yu L; Li J; Chen S
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Nov; 14(4):206-12. PubMed ID: 22008300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantification of bone quality using different cone beam computed tomography devices: Accuracy assessment for edentulous human mandibles.
Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Slagmolen P; Politis C; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(4):411-424. PubMed ID: 27990508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of scanning and reconstruction parameters on quality of three-dimensional surface models of the dental arches from cone beam computed tomography.
Hassan B; Couto Souza P; Jacobs R; de Azambuja Berti S; van der Stelt P
Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Jun; 14(3):303-10. PubMed ID: 19506922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of voxel size and resolution on the accuracy of endodontic length measurement using cone beam computed tomography.
Aktan AM; Yildirim C; Karataşlıoğlu E; Çiftçi ME; Aksoy F
Ann Anat; 2016 Nov; 208():96-102. PubMed ID: 27339301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.
Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy and reliability of different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices for structural analysis of alveolar bone in comparison with multislice CT and micro-CT.
Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Coudyzer W; Salmon B; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 28327698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements.
Baumgaertel S; Palomo JM; Palomo L; Hans MG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):19-25; discussion 25-8. PubMed ID: 19577143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of segmentation of tooth structures using 3 different CBCT machines.
Shaheen E; Khalil W; Ezeldeen M; Van de Casteele E; Sun Y; Politis C; Jacobs R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Jan; 123(1):123-128. PubMed ID: 27938942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
