These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23167471)

  • 21. Long-term survival of Cerec restorations: a 10-year study.
    Zimmer S; Göhlich O; Rüttermann S; Lang H; Raab WH; Barthel CR
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):484-7. PubMed ID: 18833853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Durability of extensive Class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after 6 years.
    Andersson-Wenckert IE; van Dijken JW; Kieri C
    Am J Dent; 2004 Feb; 17(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 15241909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Longevity and reasons for failure of sandwich and total-etch posterior composite resin restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
    J Adhes Dent; 2007 Oct; 9(5):469-75. PubMed ID: 18297828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Longevity and associated risk factors in adhesive restorations of young permanent teeth after complete and selective caries removal: a retrospective study.
    Casagrande L; Seminario AT; Correa MB; Werle SB; Maltz M; Demarco FF; Araujo FB
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Apr; 21(3):847-855. PubMed ID: 27103587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Early failure of Class II resin composite versus Class II amalgam restorations placed by dental students.
    Overton JD; Sullivan DJ
    J Dent Educ; 2012 Mar; 76(3):338-40. PubMed ID: 22383602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Longevity of direct restorations in stress-bearing posterior cavities: a retrospective study.
    Rho YJ; Namgung C; Jin BH; Lim BS; Cho BH
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(6):572-82. PubMed ID: 23550914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students.
    Opdam NJ; Loomans BA; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM
    J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):379-83. PubMed ID: 15193786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Longevity of direct restorations in Dutch dental practices. Descriptive study out of a practice based research network.
    Laske M; Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Braspenning JC; Huysmans MC
    J Dent; 2016 Mar; 46():12-7. PubMed ID: 26790901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Replacement of resin-based composite restorations in permanent teeth.
    Asghar S; Ali A; Rashid S; Hussain T
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2010 Oct; 20(10):639-43. PubMed ID: 20943103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
    Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Longevity of repaired restorations: a practice based study.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Loomans BA; Huysmans MC
    J Dent; 2012 Oct; 40(10):829-35. PubMed ID: 22771415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Twelve-year survival of 2-surface composite resin and amalgam premolar restorations placed by dental students.
    Naghipur S; Pesun I; Nowakowski A; Kim A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 27086110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical evaluation of a resin composite and bonding agent in Class I and II restorations: 2-year results.
    Lundin SA; Rasmusson CG
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Oct; 35(9):758-62. PubMed ID: 15471000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries: a preliminary report.
    Mjör IA
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Mar; 27(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 9063229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Tunnel restorations in permanent teeth. A 7 year follow up study.
    Hasselrot L
    Swed Dent J; 1998; 22(1-2):1-7. PubMed ID: 9646387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reasons for restorative therapy and the longevity of restorations in adults.
    Forss H; Widström E
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Apr; 62(2):82-6. PubMed ID: 15198387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. 5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Franco EB; Benetti AR; Ishikiriama SK; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Jorge MF; Navarro MF
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 16924979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Longevity of 2- and 3-surface restorations in posterior teeth of 25- to 30-year-olds attending Public Dental Service-A 13-year observation.
    Palotie U; Eronen AK; Vehkalahti K; Vehkalahti MM
    J Dent; 2017 Jul; 62():13-17. PubMed ID: 28529175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Longevity of conventional and bonded (sealed) amalgam restorations in a private general dental practice.
    Bonsor SJ; Chadwick RG
    Br Dent J; 2009 Jan; 206(2):E3; discussion 88-9. PubMed ID: 19148188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Placement and replacement of restorations in primary teeth.
    Mjör IA; Dahl JE; Moorhead JE
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2002 Jan; 60(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 11902609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.