374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2316756)
21. The decision to publish: ethical dilemmas.
Shapiro S
J Chronic Dis; 1985; 38(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 11643751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Allocating credit and blame in science.
Chubin DE
Sci Technol Human Values; 1988; 13(1-2):53-63. PubMed ID: 11650139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Maintaining the integrity of the scientific record.
Smith R
BMJ; 2001 Sep; 323(7313):588. PubMed ID: 11557693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Scientific misconduct and breach of publication ethics: one editor's experience.
Daroff RB
Med Law; 2007 Sep; 26(3):527-33. PubMed ID: 17970250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Studying journal editors: the worst heresy.
Epstein WM
IRB; 1989; 11(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 11650253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Editorial research and the publication process in biomedicine and health: Report from the Esteve Foundation Discussion Group, December 2012.
Marušić A; Malički M; von Elm E
Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2014; 24(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 24969914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Responsible research publication: international standards for editors.
Kleinert S; Wager E
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2014; 35(3):35-41. PubMed ID: 25711220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. British cast spotlight on misconduct in scientific research.
Altman LK
N Y Times Web; 1998 Jun; ():F3. PubMed ID: 11647563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Biomedical information, peer review, and conflict of interest as they influence public health.
Cantekin EI; McGuire TW; Potter RL
JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1427-30. PubMed ID: 2078202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Parafraud in biology.
Hillman H
Sci Eng Ethics; 1997 Apr; 3(2):121-36. PubMed ID: 11657883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Scientific misconduct and correcting the scientific literature.
Parrish DM
Acad Med; 1999 Mar; 74(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 10099640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Allegations of impropriety in manuscripts by Aws S. Salim: examination and withdrawal of journal aegis. The Executive Editorial Committee of the Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine.
Hammerschmidt DE; Gross AG
J Lab Clin Med; 1994 Jun; 123(6):795-9. PubMed ID: 8201253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. British editors form misconduct panel.
Kaiser J
Science; 1997 Aug; 277(5326):627. PubMed ID: 11644953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The process of publication.
Koshland DE
Science; 1989 Aug; 245(4918):573. PubMed ID: 11644383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Medical editors to take tougher line.
Coghlan A
New Sci; 2004 Mar 6-12; 181(2437):11. PubMed ID: 15139349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Peer review comes under peer review.
Sun M
Science; 1989 May; 244(4907):910-2. PubMed ID: 2727683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Questions of scientific responsibility: the Baltimore case.
Lang S
Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):3-72. PubMed ID: 11653082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Preparing manuscripts for publication in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery: responsibilities of authors and editors: a view from the editor of the American volume.
Cowell HR
Instr Course Lect; 1994; 43():579-86. PubMed ID: 9097189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Misconduct in research: editors respond.
Smith R
BMJ; 1997 Jul; 315(7102):201-2. PubMed ID: 9253258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Misconduct and social control in science: issues, problems, solutions.
Fox MF; Braxton JM
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 11653368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
