These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23167854)
1. Single rescuer exertion using a mechanical resuscitation device: a randomized controlled simulation study. Fischer H; Zapletal B; Neuhold S; Rützler K; Fleck T; Frantal S; Theiler L; Stumpf D; Havel C; Greif R Acad Emerg Med; 2012 Nov; 19(11):1242-7. PubMed ID: 23167854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A manually powered mechanical resuscitation device used by a single rescuer: a randomised controlled manikin study. Fischer H; Neuhold S; Zapletal B; Hochbrugger E; Koinig H; Steinlechner B; Frantal S; Stumpf D; Greif R Resuscitation; 2011 Jul; 82(7):913-9. PubMed ID: 21444144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of one-rescuer compression/ventilation ratios on cardiopulmonary resuscitation in infant, pediatric, and adult manikins. Srikantan SK; Berg RA; Cox T; Tice L; Nadkarni VM Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2005 May; 6(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 15857527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CPR PRO® device reduces rescuer fatigue during continuous chest compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized crossover trial using a manikin model. Kovic I; Lulic D; Lulic I J Emerg Med; 2013 Oct; 45(4):570-7. PubMed ID: 23845522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short structured feedback training is equivalent to a mechanical feedback device in two-rescuer BLS: a randomised simulation study. Pavo N; Goliasch G; Nierscher FJ; Stumpf D; Haugk M; Breckwoldt J; Ruetzler K; Greif R; Fischer H Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2016 May; 24():70. PubMed ID: 27177424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Over-the-head cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves efficacy in basic life support performed by professional medical personnel with a single rescuer: a simulation study. Hüpfl M; Duma A; Uray T; Maier C; Fiegl N; Bogner N; Nagele P Anesth Analg; 2005 Jul; 101(1):200-5, table of contents. PubMed ID: 15976232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing three CPR feedback devices and standard BLS in a single rescuer scenario: a randomised simulation study. Zapletal B; Greif R; Stumpf D; Nierscher FJ; Frantal S; Haugk M; Ruetzler K; Schlimp C; Fischer H Resuscitation; 2014 Apr; 85(4):560-6. PubMed ID: 24215730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new defibrillator mode to reduce chest compression interruptions for health care professionals and lay rescuers: a pilot study in manikins. Barash DM; Raymond RP; Tan Q; Silver AE Prehosp Emerg Care; 2011; 15(1):88-97. PubMed ID: 21091330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation: can anyone perform to the guidelines 2000 recommendations? Higdon TA; Heidenreich JW; Kern KB; Sanders AB; Berg RA; Hilwig RW; Clark LL; Ewy GA Resuscitation; 2006 Oct; 71(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 16942829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality of resuscitation: flight attendants in an airplane simulator use a new mechanical resuscitation device--a randomized simulation study. Fischer H; Neuhold S; Hochbrugger E; Steinlechner B; Koinig H; Milosevic L; Havel C; Frantal S; Greif R Resuscitation; 2011 Apr; 82(4):459-63. PubMed ID: 21257251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rescuer fatigue under the 2010 ERC guidelines, and its effect on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performance. McDonald CH; Heggie J; Jones CM; Thorne CJ; Hulme J Emerg Med J; 2013 Aug; 30(8):623-7. PubMed ID: 22851670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chest compression quality and rescuer fatigue with increased compression to ventilation ratio during single rescuer pediatric CPR. Haque IU; Udassi JP; Udassi S; Theriaque DW; Shuster JJ; Zaritsky AL Resuscitation; 2008 Oct; 79(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 18617314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects and limitations of an AED with audiovisual feedback for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized manikin study. Fischer H; Gruber J; Neuhold S; Frantal S; Hochbrugger E; Herkner H; Schöchl H; Steinlechner B; Greif R Resuscitation; 2011 Jul; 82(7):902-7. PubMed ID: 21454006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rescuer fatigue in the elderly: standard vs. hands-only CPR. Heidenreich JW; Bonner A; Sanders AB J Emerg Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 20634016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A different rescuer changing strategy between 30:2 cardiopulmonary resuscitation and hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation that considers rescuer factors: a randomised cross-over simulation study with a time-dependent analysis. Hong DY; Park SO; Lee KR; Baek KJ; Shin DH Resuscitation; 2012 Mar; 83(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 22101200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of the ILCOR 2005 CPR guidelines on a physical fitness assessment: a comparison of old and new protocols. Bridgewater FH; Zeitz C; Field J; Inglis A; Poulish K Resuscitation; 2008 Mar; 76(3):405-12. PubMed ID: 17976891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of dominant versus non-dominant hand position during uninterrupted chest compression CPR by novice rescuers: a randomized double-blind crossover study. Nikandish R; Shahbazi S; Golabi S; Beygi N Resuscitation; 2008 Feb; 76(2):256-60. PubMed ID: 17822829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]