These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23167956)

  • 1. Visual mismatch negativity is sensitive to symmetry as a perceptual category.
    Kecskés-Kovács K; Sulykos I; Czigler I
    Eur J Neurosci; 2013 Feb; 37(4):662-7. PubMed ID: 23167956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. One plus one is less than two: visual features elicit non-additive mismatch-related brain activity.
    Sulykos I; Czigler I
    Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 1398():64-71. PubMed ID: 21636075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual mismatch negativity is unaffected by top-down prediction of the timing of deviant events.
    Kimura M
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 May; 236(5):1283-1292. PubMed ID: 29487967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual mismatch negativity (vMMN) for low- and high-level deviances: A control study.
    File D; File B; Bodnár F; Sulykos I; Kecskés-Kovács K; Czigler I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2153-2170. PubMed ID: 28710556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Action-induced adjustment of prediction explains no visual mismatch negativity to self-generated deviants.
    Kimura M; Takeda Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Aug; 131():111-118. PubMed ID: 31121183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual mismatch negativity and stimulus-specific adaptation: the role of stimulus complexity.
    Kojouharova P; File D; Sulykos I; Czigler I
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 May; 237(5):1179-1194. PubMed ID: 30806740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Event-related potentials elicited by pre-attentive emotional changes in temporal context.
    Fujimura T; Okanoya K
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e63703. PubMed ID: 23671693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ERPs and deviance detection: visual mismatch negativity to repeated visual stimuli.
    Czigler I; Weisz J; Winkler I
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Jun; 401(1-2):178-82. PubMed ID: 16600495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of attention control in visual mismatch negativity (vMMN) studies.
    Petro B; Gaál ZA; Kojouharova P; Czigler I
    Exp Brain Res; 2023 Apr; 241(4):1001-1008. PubMed ID: 36862235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Asymmetric effect of automatic deviant detection: The effect of familiarity in visual mismatch negativity.
    Sulykos I; Kecskés-Kovács K; Czigler I
    Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 1626():108-17. PubMed ID: 25724142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual mismatch negativity is sensitive to illusory brightness changes.
    Sulykos I; Czigler I
    Brain Res; 2014 May; 1561():48-59. PubMed ID: 24637257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual Mismatch Negativity Reflects Enhanced Response to the Deviant: Evidence From Event-Related Potentials and Electroencephalogram Time-Frequency Analysis.
    Zeng X; Ji L; Liu Y; Zhang Y; Fu S
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():800855. PubMed ID: 35350445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Backward masking and visual mismatch negativity: electrophysiological evidence for memory-based detection of deviant stimuli.
    Czigler I; Weisz J; Winkler I
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Jul; 44(4):610-9. PubMed ID: 17521378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unnoticed regularity violation elicits change-related brain activity.
    Czigler I; Pató L
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Mar; 80(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 19111891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual mismatch negativity and categorization.
    Czigler I
    Brain Topogr; 2014 Jul; 27(4):590-8. PubMed ID: 24057352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cortical and subcortical visual event-related potentials to oddball stimuli in rabbits.
    Astikainen P; Ruusuvirta T; Korhonen T
    Neuroreport; 2000 May; 11(7):1515-7. PubMed ID: 10841368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual change detection: event-related potentials are dependent on stimulus location in humans.
    Czigler I; Balázs L; Pató LG
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Jul; 364(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 15196665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automatic change detection in vision: Adaptation, memory mismatch, or both? II: Oddball and adaptation effects on event-related potentials.
    Bodnár F; File D; Sulykos I; Kecskés-Kovács K; Czigler I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Nov; 79(8):2396-2411. PubMed ID: 28853023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does surprise enhancement or repetition suppression explain visual mismatch negativity?
    Amado C; Kovács G
    Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 43(12):1590-600. PubMed ID: 27108896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Short-term trained lexical categories affect preattentive shape perception: Evidence from vMMN.
    Yu M; Mo C; Zeng T; Zhao S; Mo L
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Mar; 54(3):462-468. PubMed ID: 27914168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.