These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy: a comparison with the open technique and how to reach quality standards: a single-center experience in Thailand. Taweemonkongsap T; Nualyong C; Amornvesukit T; Srinualnad S; Jitpraphai S; Premasathian N; Sujijantararat P; Tantiwong A; Soontrapa S Transplant Proc; 2011 Dec; 43(10):3593-8. PubMed ID: 22172811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Introducing hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy: learning curves and development based on 413 consecutive cases in four centers. Wadström J; Biglarnia A; Gjertsen H; Sugitani A; Fronek J Transplantation; 2011 Feb; 91(4):462-9. PubMed ID: 21169880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Technical modifications of retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy: Chinese experience. Ma L; Ye J; Tian X; Wang G; Hou X; Zhao L Transplant Proc; 2010 Nov; 42(9):3440-3. PubMed ID: 21094793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative outcomes of open nephrectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy, and full laparoscopic nephrectomy for living donors. Ungbhakorn P; Kongchareonsombat W; Leenanupan C; Kijvikai K; Wisetsingh W; Patcharatrakul S; Jirasiritam S Transplant Proc; 2012 Jan; 44(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 22310568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcome of renal transplantation with multiple versus single renal arteries after laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a comparative study. Desai MR; Ganpule AP; Gupta R; Thimmegowda M Urology; 2007 May; 69(5):824-7. PubMed ID: 17482914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: impact on an established renal transplant program. Shafizadeh S; McEvoy JR; Murray C; Baillie GM; Ashcraft E; Sill T; Rogers J; Baliga P; Rajagopolan PR; Chavin K Am Surg; 2000 Dec; 66(12):1132-5. PubMed ID: 11149584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: evolution and current practice. Potter SR Nephrol News Issues; 2006 Sep; 20(10):43-5, 47. PubMed ID: 16977921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: debating the benefits. Con: persistent complications do not justify replacing "the gold standard". Serota AI Nephrol News Issues; 1999 Nov; 13(11):90-4. PubMed ID: 10865642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy and conventional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: donor and recipient outcomes. Afaneh C; Aull MJ; Gimenez E; Wang G; Charlton M; Leeser DB; Kapur S; Del Pizzo JJ Urology; 2011 Dec; 78(6):1332-7. PubMed ID: 21996107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 3-year experience. Jacobs SC; Cho E; Dunkin BJ; Flowers JL; Schweitzer E; Cangro C; Fink J; Farney A; Philosophe B; Jarrell B; Bartlett ST J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1494-9. PubMed ID: 11025690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The way to establish laparoscopic donor nephrectomy as the method of choice in live kidney donation--a single centre experience]. Saad S; Arns W; Paul A; Nagelschmidt M; Heiss M; Treckmann J Zentralbl Chir; 2008 Apr; 133(2):188-92. PubMed ID: 18415910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of right versus left laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Bachir BG; Hussein M; Nasr R; Abu-Dargham R; Khauli RB Exp Clin Transplant; 2011 Oct; 9(5):310-4. PubMed ID: 21967256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]