These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23169718)

  • 1. Abdominal CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR): initial results of a prospective trial comparing ultralow-dose with standard-dose imaging.
    Pickhardt PJ; Lubner MG; Kim DH; Tang J; Ruma JA; del Rio AM; Chen GH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Dec; 199(6):1266-74. PubMed ID: 23169718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of image quality and radiation dose reduction in upper abdominal computed tomography using model-based iterative reconstruction; comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Onishi H; Tsuboyama T; Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Tomiyama N
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1715-23. PubMed ID: 26037266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Do S; Thibault JB; Pien H; O'Connor OJ; Blake MA
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 22592622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CT of the chest with model-based, fully iterative reconstruction: comparison with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Ichikawa Y; Kitagawa K; Nagasawa N; Murashima S; Sakuma H
    BMC Med Imaging; 2013 Aug; 13():27. PubMed ID: 23927627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Image comparative assessment using iterative reconstructions: clinical comparison of low-dose abdominal/pelvic computed tomography between adaptive statistical, model-based iterative reconstructions and traditional filtered back projection in 65 patients.
    Vardhanabhuti V; Riordan RD; Mitchell GR; Hyde C; Roobottom CA
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):209-16. PubMed ID: 24368613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study.
    Deák Z; Grimm JM; Treitl M; Geyer LL; Linsenmaier U; Körner M; Reiser MF; Wirth S
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 23169793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CT Dose Reduction for Visceral Adipose Tissue Measurement: Effects of Model-Based and Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstructions and Filtered Back Projection.
    Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Niijima Y; Hashimoto M; Yamada M; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):W677-83. PubMed ID: 26001256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography.
    Chang W; Lee JM; Lee K; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Han JK; Choi BI
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):598-606. PubMed ID: 23511193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultralow-dose CT of the craniofacial bone for navigated surgery using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and model-based iterative reconstruction: 2D and 3D image quality.
    Widmann G; Schullian P; Gassner EM; Hoermann R; Bale R; Puelacher W
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Mar; 204(3):563-9. PubMed ID: 25714286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospective Evaluation of Reduced Dose Computed Tomography for the Detection of Low-Contrast Liver Lesions: Direct Comparison with Concurrent Standard Dose Imaging.
    Pooler BD; Lubner MG; Kim DH; Chen OT; Li K; Chen GH; Pickhardt PJ
    Eur Radiol; 2017 May; 27(5):2055-2066. PubMed ID: 27595834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Model-based iterative reconstruction versus adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection in liver 64-MDCT: focal lesion detection, lesion conspicuity, and image noise.
    Shuman WP; Green DE; Busey JM; Kolokythas O; Mitsumori LM; Koprowicz KM; Thibault JB; Hsieh J; Alessio AM; Choi E; Kinahan PE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 May; 200(5):1071-6. PubMed ID: 23617492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of Filtered Back Projection, Adaptive Statistical, and Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction for Reduced Dose Abdominal Computed Tomography.
    Padole A; Singh S; Lira D; Blake MA; Pourjabbar S; Khawaja RD; Choy G; Saini S; Do S; Kalra MK
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(4):462-7. PubMed ID: 25734468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Hsieh J; Licato PE; Do S; Pien HH; Blake MA
    Radiology; 2010 Nov; 257(2):373-83. PubMed ID: 20829535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Submillisievert chest CT with filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction techniques.
    Padole A; Singh S; Ackman JB; Wu C; Do S; Pourjabbar S; Khawaja RD; Otrakji A; Digumarthy S; Shepard JA; Kalra M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):772-81. PubMed ID: 25247943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V technique for radiation dose reduction in abdominal CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.
    Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Kim D; Cho J; Kim S; Lee S; Lee J
    Br J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 88(1054):20150463. PubMed ID: 26234823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients.
    Sagara Y; Hara AK; Pavlicek W; Silva AC; Paden RG; Wu Q
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):713-9. PubMed ID: 20729451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance evaluation of two iterative reconstruction algorithms, MBIR and ASIR, in low radiation dose and low contrast dose abdominal CT in children.
    Sun J; Yang L; Zhou Z; Zhang D; Han W; Zhang Q; Peng Y
    Radiol Med; 2020 Oct; 125(10):918-925. PubMed ID: 32319005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Superior objective and subjective image quality of deep learning reconstruction for low-dose abdominal CT imaging in comparison with model-based iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection.
    Tamura A; Mukaida E; Ota Y; Kamata M; Abe S; Yoshioka K
    Br J Radiol; 2021 Jul; 94(1123):20201357. PubMed ID: 34142867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Image quality improvement using model-based iterative reconstruction in low dose chest CT for children with necrotizing pneumonia.
    Sun J; Yu T; Liu J; Duan X; Hu D; Liu Y; Peng Y
    BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Mar; 17(1):24. PubMed ID: 28302073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Image quality assessment of standard- and low-dose chest CT using filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and novel model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms.
    Vardhanabhuti V; Loader RJ; Mitchell GR; Riordan RD; Roobottom CA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):545-52. PubMed ID: 23436843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.