194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23169727)
1. New exposure indicators for digital radiography simplified for radiologists and technologists.
Don S; Whiting BR; Rutz LJ; Apgar BK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Dec; 199(6):1337-41. PubMed ID: 23169727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The standardized exposure index for digital radiography: an opportunity for optimization of radiation dose to the pediatric population.
Seibert JA; Morin RL
Pediatr Radiol; 2011 May; 41(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 21491197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Standardized Exposure Index for Digital Radiography.
Brake DA
Radiol Technol; 2016 May; 87(5):581-5. PubMed ID: 27146186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Global quality control perspective for the physical and technical aspects of screen-film mammography--image quality and radiation dose.
Ng KH; Jamal N; DeWerd L
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 16709704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Current state of practice regarding digital radiography exposure indicators and deviation indices: Report of AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 232.
Dave JK; Jones AK; Fisher R; Hulme K; Rill L; Zamora D; Woodward A; Brady S; MacDougall RD; Goldman L; Lang S; Peck D; Apgar B; Shepard SJ; Uzenoff R; Willis C
Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):e1146-e1160. PubMed ID: 30255505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pediatric digital radiography summit overview: state of confusion.
Don S
Pediatr Radiol; 2011 May; 41(5):567-72. PubMed ID: 21491196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital radiography image quality: image processing and display.
Krupinski EA; Williams MB; Andriole K; Strauss KJ; Applegate K; Wyatt M; Bjork S; Seibert JA; ; ;
J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Jun; 4(6):389-400. PubMed ID: 17544140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital radiography image quality: image acquisition.
Williams MB; Krupinski EA; Strauss KJ; Breeden WK; Rzeszotarski MS; Applegate K; Wyatt M; Bjork S; Seibert JA
J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Jun; 4(6):371-88. PubMed ID: 17544139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
International Commission on Radiological Protection
Ann ICRP; 2004; 34(1):1-73. PubMed ID: 15302167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality assurance: using the exposure index and the deviation index to monitor radiation exposure for portable chest radiographs in neonates.
Cohen MD; Cooper ML; Piersall K; Apgar BK
Pediatr Radiol; 2011 May; 41(5):592-601. PubMed ID: 21191577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ICRP recommendations on 'Managing patient dose in digital radiology'.
Vano E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):126-30. PubMed ID: 15933093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Harmonisation of individual monitoring in Europe.
Schumacher H; Phihet P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 112(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 15574984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality assurance in dental radiography: intra-oral image quality analysis.
Bolas A; Fitzgerald M
J Ir Dent Assoc; 2008 Dec-2009 Jan; 54(6):274-8. PubMed ID: 19189748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Image Gently: challenges for radiologic technologists when performing digital radiography in children.
Goske MJ; Charkot E; Herrmann T; John SD; Mills TT; Morrison G; Smith SN
Pediatr Radiol; 2011 May; 41(5):611-9. PubMed ID: 21491201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implementation of standards for individual monitoring in Europe.
Fantuzzi E; Alves JG; Ambrosi P; Janzekovic H; Vartiainen E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 112(1):3-44. PubMed ID: 15574985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pediatric digital radiography education for radiologic technologists: current state.
Morrison G; John SD; Goske MJ; Charkot E; Herrmann T; Smith SN; Culbertson J; Carbonneau K
Pediatr Radiol; 2011 May; 41(5):602-10. PubMed ID: 21491200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Image gently campaign back to basics initiative: ten steps to help manage radiation dose in pediatric digital radiography.
Don S; Macdougall R; Strauss K; Moore QT; Goske MJ; Cohen M; Herrmann T; John SD; Noble L; Morrison G; Lehman L; Whiting BR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 May; 200(5):W431-6. PubMed ID: 23617510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Technical parameters to decrease the radiation dose from conventional and digital radiographs].
Foulquier JN
J Radiol; 2010 Nov; 91(11 Pt 2):1225-30. PubMed ID: 21178896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Are exposure index values consistent in clinical practice? A multi-manufacturer investigation.
Butler ML; Rainford L; Last J; Brennan PC
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):371-4. PubMed ID: 20223849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Name those quantities.
Strom DJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 108(3):183-5. PubMed ID: 15031440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
