266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23169811)
1. Practical application of suspension criteria scenarios in general radiography, computed radiography,digital radiography and fluoroscopy.
O'Connor U; Gallagher A; O'Reilly G; Dowling A; Malone JF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):236-40. PubMed ID: 23169811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the acceptability of fluoroscopic systems for clinical use.
Balter S; O'Connor U
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 23204557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Review of acceptability criteria for X ray systems relevant for digital radiology.
Zoetelief J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):59-64. PubMed ID: 11487844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reference values for diagnostic radiology: application and impact.
Gray JE; Archer BR; Butler PF; Hobbs BB; Mettler FA; Pizzutiello RJ; Schueler BA; Strauss KJ; Suleiman OH; Yaffe MJ
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):354-8. PubMed ID: 15758190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Application of European suspension criteria to dental radiology: an Irish perspective.
Gallagher A; Bell A; O'Connor U; Dowling A; O'Reilly G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):255-9. PubMed ID: 23185069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Doses measured using AEC on direct digital radiographic (DDR) X-rays systems: updated results with an RP 162 perspective.
Bowden L; Faulkner R; Gallagher A; O'Connor U; Walsh C; Dowling A; O'Reilly G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):251-4. PubMed ID: 23175645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimization of dose and image quality for computed radiography and digital radiography.
Willis CE
J Digit Imaging; 2007 Mar; 20(1):1-3; author reply 4-5. PubMed ID: 17410404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
Busch HP; Faulkner K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acceptance testing and routine quality control in general radiography: mobile units and film/screen fixed systems.
Gray L; Dowling A; Gallagher A; Gorman D; O'Connor U; Devine M; Larkin A; Walsh C; Malone JF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):276-8. PubMed ID: 18326885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality assurance in CT with the Belgian protocol and the new European acceptability criteria.
Bosmans H; Lemmens K; Malone J; Oyen R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 23233502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dose performance evaluation of a charge coupled device and a flat-panel digital fluoroscopy system recently installed in an interventional cardiology laboratory.
Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Dafnomili P; Kyriakidis Z; Neofotistou V
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 15266080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
International Commission on Radiological Protection
Ann ICRP; 2004; 34(1):1-73. PubMed ID: 15302167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dose and quality control (DQC) in diagnostic radiology.
Holloway AF; Taylor KW; Hobbs BB
J Can Assoc Radiol; 1984 Jun; 35(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 6480667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality control in diagnostic radiology--a United States perspective.
Thiele DL
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1996 Jun; 19(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 8826715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implementation of acceptability criteria for dental radiology in Belgium.
Clarijs T
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):260-3. PubMed ID: 23175642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality control measurements for fluoroscopy systems in eight countries participating in the SENTINEL EU coordination action.
Zoetelief J; Schultz FW; Kottou S; Gray L; O'Connor U; Salat D; Kepler K; Kaplanis P; Jankowski J; Schreiner A; Vassileva J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):237-43. PubMed ID: 18310607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The revision of RP 91 on criteria for acceptability of radiological (including radiotherapy) and nuclear medicine installations.
Faulkner K; Malone JF; Christofides S; Lillicrap S; Horton P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):143-6. PubMed ID: 23169813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ICRP perspective on criteria of acceptability for medical radiological equipment.
Mattsson S; Vañó E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):158-60. PubMed ID: 23175639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
Lin PJ
Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
