These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23170955)

  • 1. The cost-effectiveness of tracking newborns with bilateral hearing impairment in Bavaria: a decision-analytic model.
    Langer A; Brockow I; Nennstiel-Ratzel U; Menn P
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Nov; 12():418. PubMed ID: 23170955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The cost-effectiveness of universal newborn screening for bilateral permanent congenital hearing impairment: systematic review.
    Colgan S; Gold L; Wirth K; Ching T; Poulakis Z; Rickards F; Wake M
    Acad Pediatr; 2012; 12(3):171-80. PubMed ID: 22583631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening of the hearing of newborns - Update.
    Schnell-Inderst P; Kunze S; Hessel F; Grill E; Siebert U; Nickisch A; von Voß H; Wasem J
    GMS Health Technol Assess; 2006 Nov; 2():Doc20. PubMed ID: 21289971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Newborn hearing screening: the great omission.
    Mehl AL; Thomson V
    Pediatrics; 1998 Jan; 101(1):E4. PubMed ID: 9417168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Current practice, accuracy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the school entry hearing screen.
    Bamford J; Fortnum H; Bristow K; Smith J; Vamvakas G; Davies L; Taylor R; Watkin P; Fonseca S; Davis A; Hind S
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 Aug; 11(32):1-168, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 17683682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS): is it possible to successfully implement it nationwide?].
    Brockow I; Kummer P; Liebl B; Nennstiel-Ratzel U
    Gesundheitswesen; 2011 Aug; 73(8-9):477-82. PubMed ID: 21887659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acceptability, benefit and costs of early screening for hearing disability: a study of potential screening tests and models.
    Davis A; Smith P; Ferguson M; Stephens D; Gianopoulos I
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 Oct; 11(42):1-294. PubMed ID: 17927921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The economics of screening infants at risk of hearing impairment: an international analysis.
    Burke MJ; Shenton RC; Taylor MJ
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Feb; 76(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 22129917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Projected cost-effectiveness of statewide universal newborn hearing screening.
    Keren R; Helfand M; Homer C; McPhillips H; Lieu TA
    Pediatrics; 2002 Nov; 110(5):855-64. PubMed ID: 12415021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Colorado newborn hearing screening project, 1992-1999: on the threshold of effective population-based universal newborn hearing screening.
    Mehl AL; Thomson V
    Pediatrics; 2002 Jan; 109(1):E7. PubMed ID: 11773575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [New challenges to the Screening Center in the Bavarian State office for Health Care and Safe Quality of Foods].
    Nennstiel-Ratzel U; Arenz S; Wildner M; Kries RV; Liebl B
    Gesundheitswesen; 2004 Feb; 66 Suppl 1():S8-12. PubMed ID: 14770331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A programme of studies including assessment of diagnostic accuracy of school hearing screening tests and a cost-effectiveness model of school entry hearing screening programmes.
    Fortnum H; Ukoumunne OC; Hyde C; Taylor RS; Ozolins M; Errington S; Zhelev Z; Pritchard C; Benton C; Moody J; Cocking L; Watson J; Roberts S
    Health Technol Assess; 2016 May; 20(36):1-178. PubMed ID: 27169435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Cost-Effectiveness of Bimodal Stimulation Compared to Unilateral and Bilateral Cochlear Implant Use in Adults with Bilateral Severe to Profound Deafness.
    Theriou C; Fielden CA; Kitterick PT
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1425-1436. PubMed ID: 30998548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A cost-effectiveness analysis of newborn hearing screening strategies.
    Kemper AR; Downs SM
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2000 May; 154(5):484-8. PubMed ID: 10807300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness of Universal and Targeted Newborn Screening for Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection.
    Gantt S; Dionne F; Kozak FK; Goshen O; Goldfarb DM; Park AH; Boppana SB; Fowler K
    JAMA Pediatr; 2016 Dec; 170(12):1173-1180. PubMed ID: 27723885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimated Cost-effectiveness of Newborn Screening for Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection in China Using a Markov Model.
    Chen K; Zhong Y; Gu Y; Sharma R; Li M; Zhou J; Wu Y; Gao Y; Qin G
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Dec; 3(12):e2023949. PubMed ID: 33275150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hearing loss assessed by universal newborn hearing screening--the new approach.
    Prpić I; Mahulja-Stamenković V; Bilić I; Haller H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Nov; 71(11):1757-61. PubMed ID: 17825432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neonatal hearing screening: modelling cost and effectiveness of hospital- and community-based screening.
    Grill E; Uus K; Hessel F; Davies L; Taylor RS; Wasem J; Bamford J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Feb; 6():14. PubMed ID: 16504089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Economic evaluation of long-term impacts of universal newborn hearing screening.
    Chiou ST; Lung HL; Chen LS; Yen AM; Fann JC; Chiu SY; Chen HH
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Jan; 56(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 27598544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing the clinical effectiveness of different new-born hearing screening strategies. A decision analysis.
    Grill E; Hessel F; Siebert U; Schnell-Inderst P; Kunze S; Nickisch A; Wasem J
    BMC Public Health; 2005 Jan; 5():12. PubMed ID: 15679901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.