234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23172009)
1. Musical sound quality impairments in cochlear implant (CI) users as a function of limited high-frequency perception.
Roy AT; Jiradejvong P; Carver C; Limb CJ
Trends Amplif; 2012 Dec; 16(4):191-200. PubMed ID: 23172009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Musical Sound Quality in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison in Bass Frequency Perception Between Fine Structure Processing and High-Definition Continuous Interleaved Sampling Strategies.
Roy AT; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):582-90. PubMed ID: 25906173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of sound quality perception in cochlear implant users during music listening.
Roy AT; Jiradejvong P; Carver C; Limb CJ
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):319-27. PubMed ID: 22314920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reverberation negatively impacts musical sound quality for cochlear implant users.
Roy AT; Vigeant M; Munjal T; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S105-13. PubMed ID: 26561881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A cochlear implant user with exceptional musical hearing ability.
Maarefvand M; Marozeau J; Blamey PJ
Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):424-32. PubMed ID: 23509878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of room acoustic parameters on speech and music perception among participants with cochlear implants.
Eurich B; Klenzner T; Oehler M
Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():122-132. PubMed ID: 30933704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Impact of Vocal Boost Manipulations on Musical Sound Quality for Cochlear Implant Users.
Limb CJ; Mo J; Jiradejvong P; Jiam NT
Laryngoscope; 2023 Apr; 133(4):938-947. PubMed ID: 35906889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of the Phantom Electrode strategy to improve bass frequency perception for music listening in cochlear implant users.
Munjal T; Roy AT; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S121-8. PubMed ID: 26561883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sound quality perception of cochlear implant recipients: low-frequency information and foreign-language effect.
Arslan NÖ; Akbulut AA; Köse B; Karaman-Demirel A; Derinsu U
Int J Audiol; 2022 Dec; 61(12):1045-1053. PubMed ID: 34894993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Deeper Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Angle Improves Detection of Musical Sound Quality Deterioration Related to Bass Frequency Removal.
Roy AT; Penninger RT; Pearl MS; Wuerfel W; Jiradejvong P; Carver C; Buechner A; Limb CJ
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Feb; 37(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 26669557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of Compression on Musical Sound Quality in Cochlear Implant Users.
Gilbert M; Jiradejvong P; Limb C
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1368-1375. PubMed ID: 30946137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of Frequency Response Manipulations on Musical Sound Quality for Cochlear Implant Users.
Mo J; Jiam NT; Deroche MLD; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221120017. PubMed ID: 35983700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Musical pitch and lexical tone perception with cochlear implants.
Wang W; Zhou N; Xu L
Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):270-8. PubMed ID: 21190394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perception of pure tones and iterated rippled noise for normal hearing and cochlear implant users.
Penninger RT; Chien WW; Jiradejvong P; Boeke E; Carver CL; Limb CJ
Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar; 17(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 23539260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing sound localization deficits in bilateral cochlear-implant users and vocoder simulations with normal-hearing listeners.
Jones H; Kan A; Litovsky RY
Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25385244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Music Is More Enjoyable With Two Ears, Even If One of Them Receives a Degraded Signal Provided By a Cochlear Implant.
Landsberger DM; Vermeire K; Stupak N; Lavender A; Neukam J; Van de Heyning P; Svirsky MA
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):476-490. PubMed ID: 31469701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of bandpass filtering on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users.
Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):EL39-44. PubMed ID: 21361410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Voice gender discrimination provides a measure of more than pitch-related perception in cochlear implant users.
Li T; Fu QJ
Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):498-502. PubMed ID: 21696330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Musical and vocal emotion perception for cochlear implants users.
Paquette S; Ahmed GD; Goffi-Gomez MV; Hoshino ACH; Peretz I; Lehmann A
Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():272-282. PubMed ID: 30181063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Music perception and appraisal: cochlear implant users and simulated cochlear implant listening.
Wright R; Uchanski RM
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(5):350-65; quiz 379. PubMed ID: 22533978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
